Literature DB >> 20413792

How does a change in labial tooth row number affect feeding kinematics and foraging performance of a ranid tadpole (Lithobates sphenocephalus)?

Matthew D Venesky1, Richard J Wassersug, Matthew J Parris.   

Abstract

Recent studies have explored feeding kinematics in tadpoles with intact labial teeth; however, it is unknown how missing teeth impacts foraging. We explored the impact of missing labial teeth on the feeding mechanics and foraging performance of Southern leopard frog (Lithobates sphenocephalus [= Rana sphenocephala]) tadpoles by controlling the pattern of labial tooth loss; that is, by surgically removing one row of labial teeth. We then used high-speed (500 frames/second) videography to test the hypothesis that tooth loss reduces the time that tadpoles attach to and graze upon an algal-covered substrate. We next conducted trials of foraging efficiency and foraging activity to test the hypothesis that tadpoles with fewer teeth forage less effectively than control tadpoles. The teeth of tadpoles from the surgery treatment slipped while closing and were in contact with an algal-covered substrate for a shorter duration compared to control tadpoles. Surprisingly, tadpoles with missing labial teeth obtained similar amounts of food and were as active as tadpoles with intact mouthparts. However, tadpoles with missing teeth completed about 25% more gape cycles per unit time than control tadpoles. Our data suggest that tadpoles with missing teeth compensate for inferior feeding kinematics during mouth closing in each gape cycle by increasing the number of gape cycles per unit time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20413792     DOI: 10.1086/BBLv218n2p160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Bull        ISSN: 0006-3185            Impact factor:   1.818


  4 in total

1.  Effect on the growth and development and induction of abnormalities by a glyphosate commercial formulation and its active ingredient during two developmental stages of the South-American Creole frog, Leptodactylus latrans.

Authors:  Nadia Carla Bach; Guillermo Sebastián Natale; Gustavo Manuel Somoza; Alicia Estela Ronco
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Optimal digestion theory does not predict the effect of pathogens on intestinal plasticity.

Authors:  Matthew D Venesky; Shane M Hanlon; Kyle Lynch; Matthew J Parris; Jason R Rohr
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Behavioral and mutagenic biomarkers in tadpoles exposed to different abamectin concentrations.

Authors:  Diogo Ferreira do Amaral; Mateus Flores Montalvão; Bruna de Oliveira Mendes; André Luis da Silva Castro; Guilherme Malafaia
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Can differences in host behavior drive patterns of disease prevalence in tadpoles?

Authors:  Matthew D Venesky; Jacob L Kerby; Andrew Storfer; Matthew J Parris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.