Literature DB >> 20413576

Implementation of measurement instruments in physical therapist practice: development of a tailored strategy.

J G Anita Stevens1, Anna J M H Beurskens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The use of measurement instruments has become a major issue in physical therapy, but their use in daily practice is infrequent. The aims of this case report were to develop and evaluate a plan for the systematic implementation of 2 measurement instruments frequently recommended in Dutch physical therapy clinical guidelines: the Patient-Specific Complaints instrument and the Six-Minute Walk Test. CASE DESCRIPTION: A systematic implementation plan was used, starting with a problem analysis of aspects of physical therapist practice. A literary search, structured interviews, and sounding board meetings were used to identify barriers and facilitators. Based on these factors, various strategies were developed through the use of a planning model for the process of change. OUTCOMES: Barriers and facilitators were revealed in various domains: physical therapists' competence and attitude (knowledge and resistance to change), organization (policy), patients (different expectations), and measurement instruments (feasibility). The strategies developed were adjustment of the measurement instruments, a self-analysis list, and an education module. Pilot testing and evaluation of the implementation plan were undertaken. The strategies developed were applicable to physical therapist practice. Self-analysis, education, and attention to the practice organization made the physical therapists aware of their actual behavior, increased their knowledge, and improved their attitudes toward and their use of measurement instruments. DISCUSSION: The use of a planning model made it possible to tailor multifaceted strategies toward various domains and phases of behavioral change. The strategies will be further developed in programs of the Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy. Future studies should examine the use of measurement instruments as an integrated part of the process of clinical reasoning. The focus of future studies should be directed not only toward physical therapists but also toward the practice organization and professional associations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20413576     DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20090105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  17 in total

1.  [Hierarchical assessment of balance and mobility : German translation and cross-cultural adaptation].

Authors:  Tobias Braun; Alina Rieckmann; Christian Grüneberg; Detlef Marks; Christian Thiel
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 1.281

2.  A Core Set of Outcome Measures for Adults With Neurologic Conditions Undergoing Rehabilitation: A CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE.

Authors:  Jennifer L Moore; Kirsten Potter; Kathleen Blankshain; Sandra L Kaplan; Linda C OʼDwyer; Jane E Sullivan
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.649

3.  Benefits of and barriers to using patient-rated outcome measures in athletic training.

Authors:  Alison R Snyder Valier; Amy L Jennings; John T Parsons; Luzita I Vela
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Using Outcome Measures in Daily Practice: Development and Evaluation of an Implementation Strategy for Physiotherapists in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Raymond A H M Swinkels; Guus M Meerhoff; Jan W H Custers; Roland P S van Peppen; Anna J H M Beurskens; Harriet Wittink
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.037

5.  Measurement Precision and Efficiency of Computerized Adaptive Testing for the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale in People With Stroke.

Authors:  Bryant A Seamon; Steven A Kautz; Craig A Velozo
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2021-04-04

Review 6.  Current use and barriers and facilitators for implementation of standardised measures in physical therapy in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Raymond A H M Swinkels; Roland P S van Peppen; Harriet Wittink; Jan W H Custers; Anna J H M Beurskens
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-05-22       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Clinician adherence to a standardized assessment battery across settings and disciplines in a poststroke rehabilitation population.

Authors:  Marghuretta D Bland; Audra Sturmoski; Michelle Whitson; Hilary Harris; Lisa Tabor Connor; Robert Fucetola; Jeff Edmiaston; Thy Huskey; Alexandre Carter; Marian Kramper; Maurizio Corbetta; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.060

8.  Developing a questionnaire to identify perceived barriers for implementing the Dutch physical therapy COPD clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Philip J van der Wees; Cor A M Zagers; Sara E de Die; Erik J M Hendriks; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden; Rob A de Bie
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Evaluation of the theory-based Quality Improvement in Physical Therapy (QUIP) programme: a one-group, pre-test post-test pilot study.

Authors:  Geert M Rutten; Janneke Harting; L Kay Bartholomew; Angelique Schlief; Rob A B Oostendorp; Nanne K de Vries
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Evaluation of a tailored, multi-component intervention for implementation of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in primary care physical therapy: a non-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Susanne Bernhardsson; Maria E H Larsson; Robert Eggertsen; Monika Fagevik Olsén; Kajsa Johansson; Per Nilsen; Lena Nordeman; Maurits van Tulder; Birgitta Öberg
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.