Literature DB >> 20413197

Biomechanical modeling of the lateral decubitus posture during corrective scoliosis surgery.

N M Lalonde1, I Villemure, R Pannetier, Stefan Parent, C-E Aubin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient prone positioning in scoliosis surgeries modifies the spinal curves prior to instrumentation. However, the biomechanical effects of the lateral decubitus posture, used in anterior approaches and minimally invasive techniques, have not yet been investigated. The objectives were to develop and validate a finite element model simulating the spinal changes resulting from this positioning.
METHODS: The 3D pre-op reconstructed geometries of six adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis were used to develop personalized finite element models of the spine, which integrated a three-step method simulating the lateral posture. Clinical indices were measured on pre- and intra-operative radiographs to validate the finite element model.
FINDINGS: The major Cobb angle and apical vertebral translation were reduced by 44% and 37% respectively between the pre- and intra-op postures. Using appropriately oriented gravity forces and boundary conditions, the finite element model simulations represented adequately these changes, with average differences of 4 degrees for the major Cobb angle and 4mm for the apical vertebral translation with the radiographic values.
INTERPRETATION: Lateral decubitus positioning significantly reduces the spinal deformities prior to instrumentation, as demonstrated by the finite element model. This study is a first step in the development of a modeling tool for the optimal adjustments of intra-operative positioning, which remains to be further investigated with complementary clinical studies. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20413197     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  5 in total

1.  Biomechanical comparison of fusionless growth modulation corrective techniques in pediatric scoliosis.

Authors:  Mark Driscoll; Carl-Eric Aubin; Alain Moreau; Stefan Parent
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Prediction outcomes for anterior vertebral body growth modulation surgery from discriminant spatiotemporal manifolds.

Authors:  William Mandel; Olivier Turcot; Dejan Knez; Stefan Parent; Samuel Kadoury
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  CORR Insights®: Are the Choice of Frame and Intraoperative Patient Positioning Associated With Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes in Long-instrumented Lumbar Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity?

Authors:  Eeric Truumees
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Biomechanics of thoracolumbar junction vertebral fractures from various kinematic conditions.

Authors:  Léo Fradet; Yvan Petit; Eric Wagnac; Carl-Eric Aubin; Pierre-Jean Arnoux
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Lateral Position versus Prone Position for Cervical Laminoplasty: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Authors:  Lin Du; Yanzheng Gao; Kun Gao; Guang Yang; Shanjun Gao
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.423

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.