Literature DB >> 20413033

Continuous flow left ventricular assist device improves functional capacity and quality of life of advanced heart failure patients.

Joseph G Rogers1, Keith D Aaronson, Andrew J Boyle, Stuart D Russell, Carmelo A Milano, Francis D Pagani, Brooks S Edwards, Soon Park, Ranjit John, John V Conte, David J Farrar, Mark S Slaughter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the impact of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) on functional capacity and heart failure-related quality of life.
BACKGROUND: Newer continuous-flow LVAD are smaller and quieter than pulsatile-flow LVADs.
METHODS: Data from advanced heart failure patients enrolled in the HeartMate II LVAD (Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, California) bridge to transplantation (BTT) (n = 281) and destination therapy (DT) (n = 374) trials were analyzed. Functional status (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class, 6-min walk distance, patient activity scores), and quality of life (Minnesota Living With Heart Failure [MLWHF] and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaires [KCCQ]) were collected before and after LVAD implantation.
RESULTS: Compared with baseline, LVAD patients demonstrated early and sustained improvements in functional status and quality of life. Most patients had NYHA functional class IV symptoms at baseline. Following implant, 82% (BTT) and 80% (DT) of patients at 6 months and 79% (DT) at 24 months improved to NYHA functional class I or II. Mean 6-min walk distance in DT patients was 204 m in patients able to ambulate at baseline, which improved to 350 and 360 m at 6 and 24 months. There were also significant and sustained improvements from baseline in both BTT and DT patients in median MLWHF scores (by 40 and 42 U in DT patients, or 52% and 55%, at 6 and 24 months, respectively), and KCCQ overall summary scores (by 39 and 41 U, or 170% and 178%).
CONCLUSIONS: Use of a continuous flow LVAD in advanced heart failure patients results in clinically relevant improvements in functional capacity and heart failure-related quality of life. Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20413033     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  130 in total

1.  Effects of continuous flow left ventricular assist device support on microvascular endothelial function.

Authors:  Xiaoying Lou; Danielle L Templeton; Ranjit John; Donald R Dengel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  UNOS status of heart transplant patients supported with a left ventricular assist device: is it time to reconsider the status criteria?

Authors:  Mark S Slaughter
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2011

3.  Continuous-flow LVAD improves quality of life.

Authors:  Joana Osório
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Replacement of the aortic valve with a bioprosthesis at the time of continuous flow ventricular assist device implantation for preexisting aortic valve dysfunction.

Authors:  Brian Lima; Themistokles Chamogeorgakis; Maria Mountis; Gonzalo V Gonzalez-Stawinski
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2015-10

Review 5.  Remote hemodynamic monitoring for ambulatory left ventricular assist device patients.

Authors:  Brent C Lampert; Sitaramesh Emani
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  [Hemodynamics and physical capacity in patients with left ventricular assist devices : An overview].

Authors:  N Reiss; M Altesellmeier; S Mommertz; T Schmidt; S Schulte-Eistrup; D Willemsen
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 1.443

7.  Patient selection for advanced heart failure therapy referral.

Authors:  Alexander C Fanaroff; Adam D DeVore; Robert J Mentz; Mani A Daneshmand; Chetan B Patel
Journal:  Crit Pathw Cardiol       Date:  2014-03

8.  Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Patients Supported With a Left Ventricular Assist Device: An Analysis of the UNOS Database (United Network for Organ Sharing).

Authors:  Kevin J Clerkin; Arthur Reshad Garan; Brian Wayda; Raymond C Givens; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Shunichi Nakagawa; Koji Takeda; Hiroo Takayama; Yoshifumi Naka; Donna M Mancini; Paolo C Colombo; Veli K Topkara
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 8.790

9.  Baseline characteristics of patients in the treatment of preserved cardiac function heart failure with an aldosterone antagonist trial.

Authors:  Sanjiv J Shah; John F Heitner; Nancy K Sweitzer; Inder S Anand; Hae-Young Kim; Brian Harty; Robin Boineau; Nadine Clausell; Akshay S Desai; Rafael Diaz; Jerome L Fleg; Ivan Gordeev; Eldrin F Lewis; Valetin Markov; Eileen O'Meara; Bondo Kobulia; Tamaz Shaburishvili; Scott D Solomon; Bertram Pitt; Marc A Pfeffer; Rebecca Li
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 10.  Devices in the management of advanced, chronic heart failure.

Authors:  William T Abraham; Sakima A Smith
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 32.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.