Literature DB >> 20412981

The role of motor learning in stuttering adaptation: repeated versus novel utterances in a practice-retention paradigm.

Ludo Max1, Caitlin J Baldwin.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Most individuals who stutter become more fluent during repeated oral readings of the same material. This adaptation effect may reflect motor learning associated with repeated practice of speech motor sequences. We tested this hypothesis with a paradigm that used two integrated approaches to identify the role of motor learning in stuttering adaptation: to distinguish practice effects from situation effects, the texts contained both repeated and novel sentences; to differentiate learning effects from temporary performance effects, stuttering frequency was determined for both the initial adaptation readings and retention tests after 2h and 24h. Average group data for 7 stuttering individuals who showed adaptation indicate that (a) both repeated and novel sentences resulted in decreased stuttering frequency across five readings in the initial session, but the decrease was larger for repeated than for novel sentences; (b) after 2h, stuttering frequency for both types of sentences was again similar, but with additional readings the repeated sentences once again showed larger improvements in fluency; (c) after 24h, prior fluency improvements for the novel sentences had dissipated whereas retention was observed for the repeated sentences. These findings - supporting the hypothesis that motor learning plays a role in stuttering adaptation - were representative for most, but not all, individual subjects. Subjects whose data did not follow the group trend and showed comparable retention for repeated and novel sentences may adapt primarily on the basis of non-motor mechanisms. Alternatively, those subjects may in fact show more substantial generalization of motor learning effects to previously unpracticed movement sequences. EDUCATIONAL
OBJECTIVES: After reading this article, the reader will be able to: (1) summarize previous research on stuttering adaptation; (2) define motor learning and describe its essential characteristics; and (3) discuss why the results from this and previous studies suggest that stuttering adaptation may be a result of motor learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20412981      PMCID: PMC2859207          DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2009.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fluency Disord        ISSN: 0094-730X            Impact factor:   2.538


  13 in total

1.  Acquired stuttering following right frontal and bilateral pontine lesion: a case study.

Authors:  Venu Balasubramanian; Ludo Max; John Van Borsel; Kathleen O Rayca; Donald Richardson
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Reliability of the Iowa Speech Disfluency Test.

Authors:  E K SANDER
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1961-06

3.  Measures of stuttering adaptation.

Authors:  B QUARRINGTON
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1959-06

4.  Acoustical durations of speech segments during stuttering adaptation.

Authors:  D Prins; C P Hubbard
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1990-09

5.  Stuttering behavior and learning: a preliminary theoretical formulation.

Authors:  G J WISCHNER
Journal:  J Speech Disord       Date:  1950-12

6.  Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  A stuttering severity instrument for children and adults.

Authors:  G D Riley
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1972-08

8.  Frequency of stuttering following repeated unison readings.

Authors:  A Frank; O Bloodstein
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1971-09

9.  Theoretical approximations of stuttering adaptation.

Authors:  B B Gray
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1965-11

10.  A cinefluorographic investigation of repeated fluent productions of stutterers in an adaptation procedure.

Authors:  G N Zimmermann; J M Hanley
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1983-03
View more
  5 in total

1.  Motor practice effects and sensorimotor integration in adults who stutter: Evidence from visuomotor tracking performance.

Authors:  Victoria Tumanova; Patricia M Zebrowski; Shawn S Goodman; Richard M Arenas
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.538

2.  Auditory-motor adaptation is reduced in adults who stutter but not in children who stutter.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Elizabeth A Wieland; Shanqing Cai; Frank H Guenther; Soo-Eun Chang
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2017-03-02

3.  Practice and retention of nonwords in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Jayanthi Sasisekaran; Sanford Weisberg
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.538

4.  Verbal implicit sequence learning in persons who stutter and persons with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Sarah Smits-Bandstra; Vincent Gracco
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Investigating the feasibility of using transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance fluency in people who stutter.

Authors:  Jennifer Chesters; Kate E Watkins; Riikka Möttönen
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 2.381

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.