Literature DB >> 20412935

Genetic parameters for buffalo milk yield and milk quality traits using Bayesian inference.

R R Aspilcueta-Borquis1, F R Araujo Neto, F Baldi, A B Bignardi, L G Albuquerque, H Tonhati.   

Abstract

The availability of accurate genetic parameters for important economic traits in milking buffaloes is critical for implementation of a genetic evaluation program. In the present study, heritabilities and genetic correlations for fat (FY305), protein (PY305), and milk (MY305) yields, milk fat (%F) and protein (%P) percentages, and SCS were estimated using Bayesian methodology. A total of 4,907 lactations from 1,985 cows were used. The (co)variance components were estimated using multiple-trait analysis by Bayesian inference method, applying an animal model, through Gibbs sampling. The model included the fixed effects of contemporary groups (herd-year and calving season), number of milking (2 levels), and age of cow at calving as (co)variable (quadratic and linear effect). The additive genetic, permanent environmental, and residual effects were included as random effects in the model. The posterior means of heritability distributions for MY305, FY305, PY305, %F, P%, and SCS were 0.22, 0.21, 0.23, 0.33, 0.39, and 0.26, respectively. The genetic correlation estimates ranged from -0.13 (between %P and SCS) to 0.94 (between MY305 and PY305). The permanent environmental correlation estimates ranged from -0.38 (between MY305 and %P) to 0.97 (between MY305 and PY305). Residual and phenotypic correlation estimates ranged from -0.26 (between PY305 and SCS) to 0.97 (between MY305 and PY305) and from -0.26 (between MY305 and SCS) to 0.97 (between MY305 and PY305), respectively. Milk yield, milk components, and milk somatic cells counts have enough genetic variation for selection purposes. The genetic correlation estimates suggest that milk components and milk somatic cell counts would be only slightly affected if increasing milk yield were the selection goal. Selecting to increase FY305 or PY305 will also increase MY305, %P, and %F. Copyright 2010 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20412935     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  5 in total

1.  Effects of a single nucleotide polymorphism in the leptin gene on the productive traits of dairy buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis).

Authors:  Larissa Zetouni; Gregório Miguel Ferreira de Camargo; Patrícia Dias da Silva Fonseca; Fernanda Maria Monsalves Gil; Naudin Alejandro Hurtado Lugo; Rusbel Raul Aspilcueta-Borquis; Marcelo Cervini; Humberto Tonhati
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  An Integrative Genomic Prediction Approach for Predicting Buffalo Milk Traits by Incorporating Related Cattle QTLs.

Authors:  Xingjie Hao; Aixin Liang; Graham Plastow; Chunyan Zhang; Zhiquan Wang; Jiajia Liu; Angela Salzano; Bianca Gasparrini; Giuseppe Campanile; Shujun Zhang; Liguo Yang
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.141

3.  Association between age at first calving, first lactation traits and lifetime productivity in Murrah buffaloes.

Authors:  P Tamboli; A Bharadwaj; A Chaurasiya; Y C Bangar; A Jerome
Journal:  Anim Biosci       Date:  2022-01-05

4.  Estimates of genetic parameters for fat yield in Murrah buffaloes.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Vikas Vohra; Poonam Ratwan; Jamuna Valsalan; C S Patil; A K Chakravarty
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2016-03-19

5.  Metagenomics analysis revealed the distinctive ruminal microbiome and resistive profiles in dairy buffaloes.

Authors:  Hui-Zeng Sun; Ke-Lan Peng; Ming-Yuan Xue; Jian-Xin Liu
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2021-07-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.