Literature DB >> 20412542

Early-stage valuation of medical devices: the role of developmental uncertainty.

Alan Girling1, Terry Young, Celia Brown, Richard Lilford.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: At the concept stage, many uncertainties surround the commercial viability of a new medical device. These include the ultimate functionality of the device, the cost of producing it and whether, and at what price, it can be sold to a health-care provider (HCP). Simple assessments of value can be made by estimating such unknowns, but the levels of uncertainty may mean that their operational value for investment decisions is unclear. However, many decisions taken at the concept stage are reversible and will be reconsidered later before the product is brought to market. This flexibility can be exploited to enhance early-stage valuations.
OBJECTIVES: To develop a framework for valuing a new medical device at the concept stage that balances benefit to the HCP against commercial costs. This is done within a simplified stage-gated model of the development cycle for new products. The approach is intended to complement existing proposals for the evaluation of the commercial headroom available to new medical products.
CONCLUSIONS: A model based on two decision gates can lead to lower bounds (underestimates) for product value that can serve to support a decision to develop the product. Quantifiable uncertainty that can be resolved before the device is brought to market will generally enhance early-stage valuations of the device, and this remains true even when some components of uncertainty cannot be fully described. Clinical trials and other evidence-gathering activities undertaken as part of the development process can contribute to early-stage estimates of value.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20412542     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00726.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of a predevelopment service delivery intervention: an application to improve clinical handovers.

Authors:  Guiqing Lily Yao; Nicola Novielli; Semira Manaseki-Holland; Yen-Fu Chen; Marcel van der Klink; Paul Barach; Peter J Chilton; Richard J Lilford
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 7.035

2.  HEADROOM APPROACH TO DEVICE DEVELOPMENT: CURRENT AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS.

Authors:  Alan Girling; Richard Lilford; Amanda Cole; Terry Young
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Medical Device Development Process, and Associated Risks and Legislative Aspects-Systematic Review.

Authors:  Petra Marešová; Blanka Klímová; Jan Honegr; Kamil Kuča; Wan Nur Hidayah Ibrahim; Ali Selamat
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-07-30

4.  Early Health Economic Modelling - Optimizing Development for Medical Device Developers? Comment on "Problems and Promises of Health Technologies: The Role of Early Health Economic Modeling".

Authors:  Conor Teljeur; Máirín Ryan
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2020-09-01

5.  Can we increase efficiency of CT lung cancer screening by combining with CVD and COPD screening? Results of an early economic evaluation.

Authors:  Carina M Behr; Hendrik Koffijberg; Koen Degeling; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Maarten J IJzerman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 7.034

6.  Exploring the misalignment on the value of further research between payers and manufacturers. A case study on a novel total artificial heart.

Authors:  Carlo Federici; Leandro Pecchia
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Health economic evaluations of medical devices in the People's Republic of China: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Rongrong Zhang; Farhang Modaresi; Oleg Borisenko
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2015-04-09

8.  A five-year model to assess the early cost-effectiveness of new diagnostic tests in the early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Leander R Buisman; Jolanda J Luime; Mark Oppe; Johanna M W Hazes; Maureen P M H Rutten-van Mölken
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 5.156

9.  Problems and Promises of Health Technologies: The Role of Early Health Economic Modeling.

Authors:  Janneke P C Grutters; Tim Govers; Jorte Nijboer; Marcia Tummers; Gert Jan van der Wilt; Maroeska M Rovers
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2019-10-01

10.  A Web-Based Communication Platform to Improve Home Care Services in Norway (DigiHelse): Pilot Study.

Authors:  Linn Nathalie Støme; Tron Moger; Kristian Kidholm; Kari J Kværner
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2020-01-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.