Literature DB >> 20411157

Quantitative Comparison of Minimum Inductance and Minimum Power Algorithms for the Design of Shim Coils for Small Animal Imaging.

Parisa Hudson1, Stephen D Hudson, William B Handler, Timothy J Scholl, Blaine A Chronik.   

Abstract

High-performance shim coils are required for high-field magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Complete sets of high-power and high-performance shim coils were designed using two different methods: the minimum inductance and the minimum power target field methods. A quantitative comparison of shim performance in terms of merit of inductance (ML) and merit of resistance (MR) was made for shim coils designed using the minimum inductance and the minimum power design algorithms. In each design case, the difference in ML and the difference in MR given by the two design methods was <15%. Comparison of wire patterns obtained using the two design algorithms show that minimum inductance designs tend to feature oscillations within the current density; while minimum power designs tend to feature less rapidly varying current densities and lower power dissipation. Overall, the differences in coil performance obtained by the two methods are relatively small. For the specific case of shim systems customized for small animal imaging, the reduced power dissipation obtained when using the minimum power method is judged to be more significant than the improvements in switching speed obtained from the minimum inductance method.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20411157      PMCID: PMC2857351          DOI: 10.1002/cmr.b.20159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng        ISSN: 1552-5031            Impact factor:   1.176


  6 in total

1.  Single-voxel proton MRS of the human brain at 1.5T and 3.0T.

Authors:  P B Barker; D O Hearshen; M D Boska
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  SNR versus resolution in 3D 1H MRS of the human brain at high magnetic fields.

Authors:  B S Li; J Regal; O Gonen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Design and evaluation of shielded gradient coils.

Authors:  J W Carlson; K A Derby; K C Hawryszko; M Weideman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Constrained length minimum inductance gradient coil design.

Authors:  B A Chronik; B K Rutt
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Multilayer Gradient Coil Design

Authors: 
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 6.  Gradient coil design: a review of methods.

Authors:  R Turner
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.546

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.