Literature DB >> 20410807

Diagnostic utility of novel stem cell markers SALL4, OCT4, NANOG, SOX2, UTF1, and TCL1 in primary mediastinal germ cell tumors.

Aijun Liu1, Liang Cheng, Jun Du, Yan Peng, Robert W Allan, Lixin Wei, Jianping Li, Dengfeng Cao.   

Abstract

Primary mediastinal germ cell tumors (GCTs) are rare and sometimes they pose diagnostic difficulty without immunohistochemical studies. Here, we investigated the diagnostic utility of 6 stem cell markers (SCMs) SALL4, OCT4, NANOG, SOX2, UTF1, and TCL1 in 16 primary mediastinal seminomas, 3 embryonal carcinomas (ECs), 10 yolk sac tumors (YSTs), 7 teratomas (4 mature, 3 immature), and 1 choriocarcinoma. The percentage of tumor cells stained was scored as: 0 (no tumor cell staining), 1+ (< or =30%), 2+ (31% to 60%), 3+ (61% to 90%), and 4+ (>90%). The staining intensity of SCMs was scored as weak, moderate, or strong. We also compared them with currently used GCT markers placental-like alkaline phosphatase (PLAP), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), c-KIT, CD30, and glypican-3. All 16 seminomas showed staining for SALL4 (4+ in 15, 2+ in 1) (15 strong, 1 moderate), OCT4 (4+ in 11, 3+ in 4, 2+ in 1) (13 strong, 3 moderate), and UTF1 (4+ in 13, 3+ in 2, 2+ in 1) (7 strong, 5 moderate, 4 weak). Positive staining was shown by 9/9 seminomas tested for NANOG (4+ in 7, 2+ in 2) (8 strong, 1 weak), TCL1 (4+ strong in all), c-KIT (4+ in all), and PLAP (4+ in 5, 3+ in 1, 2+ in 2, 1+ in 1), but SOX2 staining was negative in all these tumors. All 3 ECs showed 4+ strong staining for SALL4, OCT4, and UTF1 but negative for TCL1. SOX2 staining was seen in 3/3 ECs (4+ strong in 1, 3+ weak to moderate in 2) whereas NANOG staining was seen in 2/3 ECs (2+ weak, 1+ moderate). CD30 staining was seen in 3/3 ECs (1+, 2+, 4+). Strong SALL4 staining was seen in 10/10 YSTs (4+ in 9, 2+ in 1). All 10 YSTs showed AFP (1+ in 7, 2+ in 1, 3+ in 2) and glypican-3 (1+ in 3, 2+ in 1, 3+ in 5, 4+ in 1) staining but only 4/10 YSTs showed PLAP staining (1+ in all 4). The mean percentage of YST cells stained with SALL4 was 92%, whereas it was 23% for AFP, 50% for glypican-3, and 4% for PLAP (P<0.01). Focal (1+) SALL4 (weak) and SOX2 (weak to moderate) staining was seen in 2/7 and 4/7 teratomas, respectively. The choriocarcinoma was negative for all 6 SCMs. Eleven thymomas and 6 thymic carcinomas were negative for 6 SCMs. No staining of NANOG and SOX2 was seen in 20 lymphomas (5 Hodgkin, 5 large B cell, 5 lymphoblastic, 5 anaplastic large cell) (other 4 SCMs in lymphomas earlier studied). Our study indicates that SALL4, OCT4, NANOG, SOX2, UTF1, and TLC1 are novel sensitive diagnostic markers for primary mediastinal GCTs, with high specificity. Of these 6 SCMs, SALL4 is the only 1 expressed in YST. These novel SCMs are more sensitive than the currently used markers for mediastinal GCTs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20410807     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181db84aa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  30 in total

1.  Induced pluripotency and oncogenic transformation are related processes.

Authors:  John W Riggs; Bonnie L Barrilleaux; Natasha Varlakhanova; Kelly M Bush; Vanessa Chan; Paul S Knoepfler
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.272

2.  HESRG: a novel biomarker for intracranial germinoma and embryonal carcinoma.

Authors:  Siyi Wanggou; Xingjun Jiang; Qiaoyu Li; Lihua Zhang; Dingyang Liu; Guifei Li; Xiangling Feng; Weidong Liu; Bin Zhu; Wei Huang; Jia Shi; Xianrui Yuan; Caiping Ren
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Immunoexpression of SALL4 in Wilms tumors and developing kidney.

Authors:  Jeremy Deisch; Jack Raisanen; Dinesh Rakheja
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Medulloepithelioma with peculiar clinical presentation, stem cell phenotype and aberrant DNA-methylation profile.

Authors:  John A Ozolek; Debra E Cohen; Marcel Kool; Stefan M Pfister; Andrey Korshunov; Andrew J Bukowinski; Amy W Davis
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2015-06-29

5.  SALL4 expression in germ cell and non-germ cell tumors: a systematic immunohistochemical study of 3215 cases.

Authors:  Markku Miettinen; Zengfeng Wang; Peter A McCue; Maarit Sarlomo-Rikala; Janusz Rys; Wojciech Biernat; Jerzy Lasota; Yi-Shan Lee
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.394

6.  SALL4 is a useful marker in the diagnostic work-up of germ cell tumors in extra-testicular locations.

Authors:  Philippe Camparo; Eva Maria Comperat
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Aberrant expression of SALL4 in acute B cell lymphoblastic leukemia: mechanism, function, and implication for a potential novel therapeutic target.

Authors:  Shikiko Ueno; Jiayun Lu; Jie He; Ailing Li; Xiaoxian Zhang; Jerome Ritz; Leslie E Silberstein; Li Chai
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 8.  Functional and clinical significance of SALL4 in breast cancer.

Authors:  Ebubekir Dirican; Mustafa Akkiprik
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-07-21

9.  Establishment and characterization of a new human extragonadal germ cell line, SEM-1, and its comparison with TCam-2 and JKT-1.

Authors:  Sarah M Russell; Melissa G Lechner; Anusuya Mokashi; Carolina Megiel; Julie K Jang; Clive R Taylor; Leendert H J Looijenga; Christopher A French; Alan L Epstein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Targeting transcription factor SALL4 in acute myeloid leukemia by interrupting its interaction with an epigenetic complex.

Authors:  Chong Gao; Todor Dimitrov; Kol Jia Yong; Hiro Tatetsu; Ha-won Jeong; Hongbo R Luo; James E Bradner; Daniel G Tenen; Li Chai
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.