OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare anteversion measurements of a human cadaveric femur obtained using axial CT slices with axial oblique reformations along the femoral neck and assess how accuracy changes across a range of simulated femur positions. CONCLUSION: Axial oblique reformations allow more accurate anteversion assessment than axial images with femoral flexion, extension, and internal and external rotation. Centers should consider replacing the standard straight axial technique with the axial oblique method for CT determination of femoral anteversion.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare anteversion measurements of a human cadaveric femur obtained using axial CT slices with axial oblique reformations along the femoral neck and assess how accuracy changes across a range of simulated femur positions. CONCLUSION: Axial oblique reformations allow more accurate anteversion assessment than axial images with femoral flexion, extension, and internal and external rotation. Centers should consider replacing the standard straight axial technique with the axial oblique method for CT determination of femoral anteversion.
Authors: Florian Schmaranzer; Till D Lerch; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast; Simon D Steppacher Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Alex M Meyer; Andrew L Schaver; Brian H Cohen; Natalie A Glass; Michael C Willey; Robert W Westermann Journal: J Hip Preserv Surg Date: 2022-04-27
Authors: Till D Lerch; Florian Schmaranzer; Markus S Hanke; Christiane Leibold; Simon D Steppacher; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast Journal: Orthopade Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 1.087
Authors: Peter Kaiser; René Attal; Mark Kammerer; Michael Thauerer; Lea Hamberger; Raul Mayr; Werner Schmoelz Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2016-08-08 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Maximilian J Hartel; Andreas Petersik; Anne Schmidt; Daniel Kendoff; Jakob Nüchtern; Johannes M Rueger; Wolfgang Lehmann; Lars G Grossterlinden Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 3.240