Literature DB >> 20409572

Innovative method for prioritizing emerging disinfection by-products (DBPs) in drinking water on the basis of their potential impact on public health.

Armelle Hebert1, Delphine Forestier, Dorothée Lenes, David Benanou, Severine Jacob, Catherine Arfi, Lucie Lambolez, Yves Levi.   

Abstract

Providing microbiologically safe drinking water is a major public health issue. However, chemical disinfection can produce unintended health hazards involving disinfection by-products (DBPs). In an attempt to clarify the potential public health concerns associated with emerging disinfection by-products (EDBPs), this study was intended to help to identify those suspected of posing potential related health effects. In view of the ever-growing list of EDBPs in drinking water and the lack of consensus about them, we have developed an innovative prioritization method that would allow us to address this issue. We first set up an exhaustive database including all the current published data relating to EDBPs in drinking water (toxicity, occurrence, epidemiology and international or local guidelines/regulations). We then developed a ranking method intended to prioritize the EDBPs. This method, which was based on a calculation matrix with different coefficients, was applied to the data regarding their potential contribution to the health risk assessment process. This procedure allowed us to identify and rank three different groups of EDBPs: Group I, consisting of the most critical EDBPs with regard to their potential health effects, has moderate occurrence but the highest toxicity. Group II has moderate to elevated occurrence and is associated with relevant toxicity, and Group III has very low occurrence and unknown or little toxicity. The EDBPs identified as posing the greatest potential risk using this method were as follows: NDMA and other nitrosamines, MX and other halofuranones, chlorate, formaldehyde and acetaldehyde, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol and pentachlorophenol, hydrazine, and two unregulated halomethanes, dichloromethane and tetrachloromethane. Our approach allowed us to define the EDBPs that it is most important to monitor in order to assess population exposure and related public health issues, and thus to improve drinking water treatment and distribution. It is also important to extend our knowledge about exposure to mixtures of emerging DBPs and possible related health effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20409572     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  9 in total

1.  Assessing regulatory violations of disinfection by-products in water distribution networks using a non-compliance potential index.

Authors:  Nilufar Islam; Rehan Sadiq; Manuel J Rodriguez; Christelle Legay
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Analysis of annual fluctuations in the content of phenol, chlorophenols and their derivatives in chlorinated drinking waters.

Authors:  Jaromir Michałowicz; Jadwiga Stufka-Olczyk; Anna Milczarek; Małgorzata Michniewicz
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Chlorination of Phenols Revisited: Unexpected Formation of α,β-Unsaturated C4-Dicarbonyl Ring Cleavage Products.

Authors:  Carsten Prasse; Urs von Gunten; David L Sedlak
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Appearance of aldehydes in the surface layer of lake waters.

Authors:  Agata Dąbrowska; Jacek Nawrocki; Elżbieta Szeląg-Wasielewska
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Genotoxicity of a Low-Dose Nitrosamine Mixture as Drinking Water Disinfection Byproducts in NIH3T3 Cells.

Authors:  Hai-Yan Wang; Ming Qin; Lei Dong; Jia-Ying Lv; Xia Wang
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Trihalomethanes in Drinking Water and Bladder Cancer Burden in the European Union.

Authors:  Iro Evlampidou; Laia Font-Ribera; David Rojas-Rueda; Esther Gracia-Lavedan; Nathalie Costet; Neil Pearce; Paolo Vineis; Jouni J K Jaakkola; Francis Delloye; Konstantinos C Makris; Euripides G Stephanou; Sophia Kargaki; Frantisek Kozisek; Torben Sigsgaard; Birgitte Hansen; Jörg Schullehner; Ramon Nahkur; Catherine Galey; Christian Zwiener; Marta Vargha; Elena Righi; Gabriella Aggazzotti; Gunda Kalnina; Regina Grazuleviciene; Kinga Polanska; Dasa Gubkova; Katarina Bitenc; Emma H Goslan; Manolis Kogevinas; Cristina M Villanueva
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Risk-Based Chemical Ranking and Generating a Prioritized Human Exposome Database.

Authors:  Fanrong Zhao; Li Li; Yue Chen; Yichao Huang; Tharushi Prabha Keerthisinghe; Agnes Chow; Ting Dong; Shenglan Jia; Shipei Xing; Benedikt Warth; Tao Huan; Mingliang Fang
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  The effect of different boiling and filtering devices on the concentration of disinfection by-products in tap water.

Authors:  Glòria Carrasco-Turigas; Cristina M Villanueva; Fernando Goñi; Panu Rantakokko; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2013-02-17

Review 9.  Effect of Disinfectants on Preventing the Cross-Contamination of Pathogens in Fresh Produce Washing Water.

Authors:  Jennifer L Banach; Imca Sampers; Sam Van Haute; H J Ine van der Fels-Klerx
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.