OBJECTIVE: Although twin studies yield consistent evidence of heritability in the frequency of adolescent alcohol use, parallel findings on parenting are more equivocal, supporting the role of genes in affective parenting but not as supportive in relation to parental control. The extent to which these patterns generalize to more nuanced forms of parenting is less clear. Furthermore, despite evidence linking parents' socialization practices with adolescents' alcohol-use behaviors, this study is the first attempt to determine the sources of this covariation. METHOD: The present study used epidemiological data from 4,729 adolescent twins (2,329 females) to examine the nature of associations between their perceptions of parenting at age 12 and frequencies of alcohol use at age 14. Univariate analyses assessed the relative contributions of genetic and environmental influences on variability within six domains of parenting. Among those displaying consistent evidence of heritability, bivariate models were used to explore sources of covariation with drinking frequency. RESULTS: Univariate models suggested both genetic and environmental sources of variability across parenting phenotypes, including sex-specific sources of genetic liability within one dimension of parenting. However, despite evidence for heritability, bivariate analyses indicated that the covariation between alcohol use and perceptions of parental knowledge and warmth were entirely mediated through shared environmental pathways. CONCLUSIONS: This study elucidates genetic and environmental sources of variability within individual parenting behaviors and characterizes the etiological nature of the association between parental socialization and adolescent alcohol use. The identification of specific and modifiable socialization practices will be crucial for the future development of parent-based prevention/intervention strategies.
OBJECTIVE: Although twin studies yield consistent evidence of heritability in the frequency of adolescent alcohol use, parallel findings on parenting are more equivocal, supporting the role of genes in affective parenting but not as supportive in relation to parental control. The extent to which these patterns generalize to more nuanced forms of parenting is less clear. Furthermore, despite evidence linking parents' socialization practices with adolescents' alcohol-use behaviors, this study is the first attempt to determine the sources of this covariation. METHOD: The present study used epidemiological data from 4,729 adolescent twins (2,329 females) to examine the nature of associations between their perceptions of parenting at age 12 and frequencies of alcohol use at age 14. Univariate analyses assessed the relative contributions of genetic and environmental influences on variability within six domains of parenting. Among those displaying consistent evidence of heritability, bivariate models were used to explore sources of covariation with drinking frequency. RESULTS: Univariate models suggested both genetic and environmental sources of variability across parenting phenotypes, including sex-specific sources of genetic liability within one dimension of parenting. However, despite evidence for heritability, bivariate analyses indicated that the covariation between alcohol use and perceptions of parental knowledge and warmth were entirely mediated through shared environmental pathways. CONCLUSIONS: This study elucidates genetic and environmental sources of variability within individual parenting behaviors and characterizes the etiological nature of the association between parental socialization and adolescent alcohol use. The identification of specific and modifiable socialization practices will be crucial for the future development of parent-based prevention/intervention strategies.
Authors: Mallory Stephenson; Peter Barr; Albert Ksinan; Fazil Aliev; Antti Latvala; Richard Viken; Richard Rose; Jaakko Kaprio; Danielle Dick; Jessica E Salvatore Journal: Addiction Date: 2020-01-08 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Sari Aaltonen; Jaakko Kaprio; Urho M Kujala; Lea Pulkkinen; Richard J Rose; Karri Silventoinen Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Jenny H D A van Beek; Kenneth S Kendler; Marleen H M de Moor; Lot M Geels; Meike Bartels; Jacqueline M Vink; Stéphanie M van den Berg; Gonneke Willemsen; Dorret I Boomsma Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2011-08-05 Impact factor: 2.805
Authors: Mallory Stephenson; Peter Barr; Fazil Aliev; Albert Ksinan; Antti Latvala; Eero Vuoksimaa; Richard Viken; Richard J Rose; Jaakko Kaprio; Danielle Dick; Jessica E Salvatore Journal: Twin Res Hum Genet Date: 2021-09-16 Impact factor: 2.470
Authors: Kirsten Mehlig; Leonie H Bogl; Monica Hunsberger; Wolfgang Ahrens; Stefaan De Henauw; Isabel Iguacel; Hannah Jilani; Dénes Molnár; Valeria Pala; Paola Russo; Michael Tornaritis; Toomas Veidebaum; Jaakko Kaprio; Lauren Lissner Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2018-08-24 Impact factor: 4.022