Literature DB >> 20408344

Comparison of patient preference for sensory attributes of fluticasone furoate or fluticasone propionate in adults with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study.

Eli O Meltzer1, Charles Andrews, Glen E Journeay, Junghee Lim, Barbara A Prillaman, Cindy Garris, Edward Philpot.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intranasal corticosteroids are first-line treatment for moderate-to-severe seasonal allergic rhinitis (AR).
OBJECTIVES: To compare preferences for fluticasone furoate and fluticasone propionate nasal sprays after 1 week of treatment in patients with symptomatic seasonal AR.
METHODS: Patients with seasonal AR were enrolled (n = 360) and randomized 1:1 to active treatment (fluticasone furoate, 110 microg, or fluticasone propionate, 200 microg, followed by crossover treatment for 1 week each) or matched placebo sequence with a 1-week washout before crossover dosing. Fluticasone furoate and fluticasone propionate efficacy was measured by change from baseline during 1 week in daily reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) that assessed severity of rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing. Patient preference for fluticasone furoate or fluticasone propionate was assessed at the end of the study by questionnaire.
RESULTS: Three hundred sixty patients from 29 clinical sites in the Unites States were randomized and treated between August 1, 2007 and November 30, 2007. Most patients were white (73%) and female (59%), with a mean age of 38.3 years, and had had seasonal AR for at least 10 years (74%). Fluticasone furoate and fluticasone propionate each reduced the daily rTNSS compared with their respective placebos (least squares mean [SD] difference, -0.8 [0.24], P < .001, and -0.6 [0.24], P = .01, respectively). More patients (P < .001) preferred fluticasone furoate to fluticasone propionate based on attributes of scent or odor (58% vs 27%), aftertaste (60% vs 18%), leaking out of the nose and down the throat (59% vs 21%), and mist gentleness (57% vs 26%). No statistically significant differences were seen in preferences regarding ease of use, delivery method, or device comfort.
CONCLUSION: Both fluticasone furoate and fluticasone propionate significantly improved symptoms in adult patients with seasonal AR. Most patients preferred the sensory attributes of fluticasone furoate to those of fluticasone propionate after 1 week of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20408344     DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2010.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol        ISSN: 1081-1206            Impact factor:   6.347


  5 in total

1.  Preferences related to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and its treatment.

Authors:  Kate Van Brunt; Louis S Matza; Peter M Classi; Joseph A Johnston
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 2.711

2.  A patient preference study that evaluated fluticasone furoate and mometasone furoate nasal sprays for allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Anahi Yanez; Alex Dimitroff; Peter Bremner; Chae-Seo Rhee; Graham Luscombe; Barbara A Prillaman; Neil Johnson
Journal:  Allergy Rhinol (Providence)       Date:  2016-01-01

Review 3.  Overcoming barriers to intranasal corticosteroid use in patients with uncontrolled allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Mary Barna Bridgeman
Journal:  Integr Pharm Res Pract       Date:  2017-05-04

4.  Burden of illness and quality of life in patients being treated for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a cohort survey.

Authors:  Mark Small; James Piercy; Pascal Demoly; Helen Marsden
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 5.871

5.  Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Intranasal Corticosteroid in Allergic Rhinitis Patients: Development of a New Questionnaire.

Authors:  Senthilraj Retinasekharan; Norasnieda Md Shukri; Ahmad Filza Ismail; Baharudin Abdullah
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.