Literature DB >> 20408246

Sensory mapping in a congenitally deaf subject: MEG and fRMI studies of cross-modal non-plasticity.

G Hickok1, D Poeppel, K Clark, R B Buxton, H A Rowley, T P Roberts.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that the auditory cortex of deaf subjects may provide an example of cross-modal compensatory plasticity. We investigated whether sensory stimulation could elicit responses from auditory areas of a congenitally deaf subject. Neuromagnetic fields were recorded using a 37-channel biomagnetometer under conditions of: 1) visual stimulation; 2) somatosensory stimulation; and 3) a simple motor task. Visual items were reversing checkerboards and single light spots, presented in various portions of the visual field; somatosensory stimuli were pneumatic taps delivered to individual digit-segments and the lip; the motor task was self-paced finger tapping. In addition, functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to observe the activation elicited by full-field checkerboard and sign language stimuli. No responses to passively presented visual or somatosensory stimuli were observed in the auditory cortex. In contrast, somatosensory, motor, and visual cortices revealed evoked magnetic responses comparable to those from control subjects, indicating canonical anatomic and physiological organization in these areas. These data suggest that primary projection areas do not reveal obvious plastic effects. We suggest that in the human auditory cortex compensatory plasticity emerges primarily as a property of non-primary areas and is best observed under attentionally demanding conditions. Copyright (c) 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 20408246     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1997)5:6<437::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO;2-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  10 in total

1.  Language-related cortex in deaf individuals: functional specialization for language or perceptual plasticity?

Authors:  D Caplan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Vibrotactile activation of the auditory cortices in deaf versus hearing adults.

Authors:  Edward T Auer; Lynne E Bernstein; Witaya Sungkarat; Manbir Singh
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Synaptic Basis for Cross-modal Plasticity: Enhanced Supragranular Dendritic Spine Density in Anterior Ectosylvian Auditory Cortex of the Early Deaf Cat.

Authors:  H Ruth Clemo; Stephen G Lomber; M Alex Meredith
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Speech-like cerebral activity in profoundly deaf people processing signed languages: implications for the neural basis of human language.

Authors:  L A Petitto; R J Zatorre; K Gauna; E J Nikelski; D Dostie; A C Evans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Somatosensory and visual crossmodal plasticity in the anterior auditory field of early-deaf cats.

Authors:  M Alex Meredith; Stephen G Lomber
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Decoding Visual Location From Neural Patterns in the Auditory Cortex of the Congenitally Deaf.

Authors:  Jorge Almeida; Dongjun He; Quanjing Chen; Bradford Z Mahon; Fan Zhang; Óscar F Gonçalves; Fang Fang; Yanchao Bi
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-09-30

7.  Altered cross-modal processing in the primary auditory cortex of congenitally deaf adults: a visual-somatosensory fMRI study with a double-flash illusion.

Authors:  Christina M Karns; Mark W Dow; Helen J Neville
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Signed words in the congenitally deaf evoke typical late lexicosemantic responses with no early visual responses in left superior temporal cortex.

Authors:  Matthew K Leonard; Naja Ferjan Ramirez; Christina Torres; Katherine E Travis; Marla Hatrak; Rachel I Mayberry; Eric Halgren
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  How does visual language affect crossmodal plasticity and cochlear implant success?

Authors:  C R Lyness; B Woll; R Campbell; V Cardin
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 10.  Compensatory plasticity in the deaf brain: effects on perception of music.

Authors:  Arla Good; Maureen J Reed; Frank A Russo
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2014-10-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.