| Literature DB >> 20407653 |
Dhruva Kumar Gani1, Deepa Lakshmi, Rama Krishnan, Pamela Emmadi.
Abstract
AIMS ANDEntities:
Keywords: C-reactive protein; Chemiluminescent immunoassay technique; interleukin-6; particle enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay technique
Year: 2009 PMID: 20407653 PMCID: PMC2847127 DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.55840
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Indian Soc Periodontol ISSN: 0972-124X
Gingival index scores in different study groups
| Sl. No | Group I | Group II | Group III |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 2.33 |
| 2 | 1.22 | 1.4 | 2.12 |
| 3 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 2.12 |
| 4 | 1.34 | 1.4 | 2.25 |
| 5 | 1.22 | 1.55 | 2.09 |
| 6 | 1.29 | 1.7 | 2.14 |
| 7 | 1.16 | 1.8 | 2.04 |
| 8 | 1.36 | 1.8 | 2.06 |
| 9 | 1.25 | 1.3 | 2.16 |
| 10 | 1.17 | 1.5 | 1.95 |
| 11 | 1.36 | 1.4 | 2.18 |
| 12 | 1.25 | 1.4 | 2.12 |
| 13 | 1.28 | 1.5 | 2.2 |
| 14 | 1.33 | 1.3 | 2.25 |
| Mean ± S.D | 1.26 ± 0.07 | 1.48 ± 0.17 | 2.14 ± 0.10 |
Inference: Mean gingival index score in group III (2.14 ± 0.10) was higher than the mean gingival index scores in group II (1.48 ± 0.17) and in group I (1.26 ± 0.07)
Gingival index parameters for the different study groups
| Group | Mean ± SD | Significant groups at 5% level | |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | 1.26 ± 0.07 | < 0.0001 (Sig) | III |
| II | 1.48 ± 0.17 | II | |
| III | 2.14 ± 0.10 |
Inference: Mean gingival index score in group I was 1.26 ± 0.07, in group II was 1.48 ± 0.17 and in group III was 2.14 ± 0.10. Mean gingival index scores were statistically significant when group III was compared to group I and group II. Mean gingival index scores were also statistically significant when group II and group I were compared
Serum C-reactive protein levels (mg/dL) in different study groups
| Sl. No | Group I | Group II | Group III |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.34 | 0.21 | 0.69 |
| 2 | 0.29 | 0.42 | 0.23 |
| 3 | 0.25 | 1.31 | 0.24 |
| 4 | 0.33 | 0.99 | 0.23 |
| 5 | 0.29 | 0.21 | 0.75 |
| 6 | 0.20 | 0.54 | 0.19 |
| 7 | 0.30 | 0.83 | 1.07 |
| 8 | 0.39 | 0.3 | 0.56 |
| 9 | 0.29 | 0.36 | 0.33 |
| 10 | 0.25 | 0.19 | 0.58 |
| 11 | 0.48 | 0.23 | 0.59 |
| 12 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.64 |
| 13 | 0.31 | 0.24 | 0.71 |
| 14 | 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.80 |
| Mean ± SD | 0.304 ± 0.073 | 0.479 ± 0.339 | 0.544 ± 0.264 |
Inference: Mean value of C-relative proteion in group I was 0.304 ± 0.073 mg/ dL, Group II was 0.479 ± 0.339 mg/dL, and group III was 0.544 ± 0.264 mg/dL. Mean value of CRP in group III was higher than group II and group I means
C-reactive protein parameters for different study groups
| Parameter | Group | Mean ± SD | Significant# group at 5% level | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 0.304 ± 0.073 | |||
| CRP | II | 0.479 ± 0.339 | 0.04 (Sig) | III |
| III | 0.544 ± 0.264 |
Inference: Mean C-relative proteion value in group I was 0.304 ± 0.073, in group II was 0.479 ± 0.339 and in group III was 0.544 ± 0.264. When group III and group I were compared, the difference in the CRP levels was statistically significant (P < 0.05), however no other differences were statistically significant (P > 0.05)
Figure 1Mean gingival index scores in different study groups
Figure 2Mean values of C-reactive protein in different study groups