Literature DB >> 20407127

Identity-by-descent matrix decomposition using latent ancestral allele models.

Cajo J F ter Braak1, Martin P Boer, L Radu Totir, Christopher R Winkler, Oscar S Smith, Marco C A M Bink.   

Abstract

Genetic linkage and association studies are empowered by proper modeling of relatedness among individuals. Such relatedness can be inferred from marker and/or pedigree information. In this study, the genetic relatedness among n inbred individuals at a particular locus is expressed as an n x n square matrix Q. The elements of Q are identity-by-descent probabilities, that is, probabilities that two individuals share an allele descended from a common ancestor. In this representation the definition of the ancestral alleles and their number remains implicit. For human inspection and further analysis, an explicit representation in terms of the ancestral allele origin and the number of alleles is desirable. To this purpose, we decompose the matrix Q by a latent class model with K classes (latent ancestral alleles). Let P be an n x K matrix with assignment probabilities of n individuals to K classes constrained such that every element is nonnegative and each row sums to 1. The problem then amounts to approximating Q by PP(T), while disregarding the diagonal elements. This is not an eigenvalue problem because of the constraints on P. An efficient algorithm for calculating P is provided. We indicate the potential utility of the latent ancestral allele model. For representative locus-specific Q matrices constructed for a set of maize inbreds, the proposed model recovered the known ancestry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20407127      PMCID: PMC2907191          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.117390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  22 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A comparison of microsatellite-based pairwise relatedness estimators.

Authors:  T Van de Casteele; P Galbusera; E Matthysen
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Bayesian oligogenic analysis of quantitative and qualitative traits in general pedigrees.

Authors:  P Uimari; M J Sillanpää
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  QTL methodology for response curves on the basis of non-linear mixed models, with an illustration to senescence in potato.

Authors:  M Malosetti; R G F Visser; C Celis-Gamboa; F A van Eeuwijk
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-05-20       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Comparison of marker-based pairwise relatedness estimators on a pedigreed plant population.

Authors:  Marco C A M Bink; Amy D Anderson; W Eric van de Weg; Elizabeth A Thompson
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Markov chain Monte Carlo segregation and linkage analysis for oligogenic models.

Authors:  S C Heath
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  A simple and rapid method for calculating identity-by-descent matrices using multiple markers.

Authors:  R Pong-Wong; A W George; J A Woolliams; C S Haley
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Population structure and eigenanalysis.

Authors:  Nick Patterson; Alkes L Price; David Reich
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  A general and efficient method for estimating continuous IBD functions for use in genome scans for QTL.

Authors:  Francois Besnier; Orjan Carlborg
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  7 in total

1.  Ancestral Relationships Using Metafounders: Finite Ancestral Populations and Across Population Relationships.

Authors:  Andres Legarra; Ole F Christensen; Zulma G Vitezica; Ignacio Aguilar; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  QTL linkage analysis of connected populations using ancestral marker and pedigree information.

Authors:  Marco C A M Bink; L Radu Totir; Cajo J F ter Braak; Christopher R Winkler; Martin P Boer; Oscar S Smith
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium QTL mapping in multiple families of maize (Zea mays L.) line crosses highlights complementarities between models based on parental haplotype and single locus polymorphism.

Authors:  N Bardol; M Ventelon; B Mangin; S Jasson; V Loywick; F Couton; C Derue; P Blanchard; A Charcosset; Laurence Moreau
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  PIGS: improved estimates of identity-by-descent probabilities by probabilistic IBD graph sampling.

Authors:  Danny S Park; Yael Baran; Farhad Hormozdiari; Celeste Eng; Dara G Torgerson; Esteban G Burchard; Noah Zaitlen
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Constrained Ordination Analysis with Enrichment of Bell-Shaped Response Functions.

Authors:  Yingjie Zhang; Olivier Thas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  How do the type of QTL effect and the form of the residual term influence QTL detection in multi-parent populations? A case study in the maize EU-NAM population.

Authors:  Vincent Garin; Valentin Wimmer; Sofiane Mezmouk; Marcos Malosetti; Fred van Eeuwijk
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Maize ARGOS1 (ZAR1) transgenic alleles increase hybrid maize yield.

Authors:  Mei Guo; Mary A Rupe; Jun Wei; Chris Winkler; Marymar Goncalves-Butruille; Ben P Weers; Sharon F Cerwick; Jo Ann Dieter; Keith E Duncan; Richard J Howard; Zhenglin Hou; Carlos M Löffler; Mark Cooper; Carl R Simmons
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 6.992

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.