Esther M John1, Jocelyn Koo, Pamela L Horn-Ross. 1. Cancer Prevention Institute of California, 2201 Walnut Avenue, Suite 300, Fremont, CA 94538, USA. Esther.john@cpic.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of moderate physical activity and life patterns of activity in reducing endometrial cancer risk remains uncertain. METHODS: We assessed lifetime histories of activity from recreation, transportation, chores, and occupation and other risk factors in a population-based case-control study of endometrial cancer conducted in the San Francisco Bay area. The analysis was based on 472 newly diagnosed cases ascertained by the regional cancer registry and 443 controls identified by random-digit dialing who completed an in-person interview. RESULTS: Reduced risks associated with greater lifetime physical activity (highest versus lowest tertile) were found for both total activity [odds ratio (OR), 0.61; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.43-0.87; Ptrend=0.01] and activity of moderate intensity (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30-0.64; Ptrend<0.0001). Compared with women with low lifetime physical activity (below median), those with greater activity throughout life had a higher reduction in risk (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44-0.88). Inverse associations were stronger in obese and overweight women, but differences were not statistically significantly different from those in normal-weight women. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that physical activity in adulthood, even of moderate intensity, may be effective in lowering the risk of endometrial cancer, particularly among those at highest risk for this disease. IMPACT: The results emphasize the importance of evaluating lifetime histories of physical activity from multiple sources, including both recreational and nonrecreational activities of various intensities, to fully understand the relation between physical activity and disease risk. Copyright (c) 2010AACR
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The role of moderate physical activity and life patterns of activity in reducing endometrial cancer risk remains uncertain. METHODS: We assessed lifetime histories of activity from recreation, transportation, chores, and occupation and other risk factors in a population-based case-control study of endometrial cancer conducted in the San Francisco Bay area. The analysis was based on 472 newly diagnosed cases ascertained by the regional cancer registry and 443 controls identified by random-digit dialing who completed an in-person interview. RESULTS: Reduced risks associated with greater lifetime physical activity (highest versus lowest tertile) were found for both total activity [odds ratio (OR), 0.61; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.43-0.87; Ptrend=0.01] and activity of moderate intensity (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30-0.64; Ptrend<0.0001). Compared with women with low lifetime physical activity (below median), those with greater activity throughout life had a higher reduction in risk (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44-0.88). Inverse associations were stronger in obese and overweight women, but differences were not statistically significantly different from those in normal-weight women. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that physical activity in adulthood, even of moderate intensity, may be effective in lowering the risk of endometrial cancer, particularly among those at highest risk for this disease. IMPACT: The results emphasize the importance of evaluating lifetime histories of physical activity from multiple sources, including both recreational and nonrecreational activities of various intensities, to fully understand the relation between physical activity and disease risk. Copyright (c) 2010 AACR
Authors: Anne McTiernan; Shelley S Tworoger; Cornelia M Ulrich; Yutaka Yasui; Melinda L Irwin; Kumar B Rajan; Bess Sorensen; Rebecca E Rudolph; Deborah Bowen; Frank Z Stanczyk; John D Potter; Robert S Schwartz Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-04-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Lisa H Colbert; James V Lacey; Catherine Schairer; Paul Albert; Arthur Schatzkin; Demetrius Albanes Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: E Salazar-Martínez; E C Lazcano-Ponce; G G Lira-Lira; P Escudero-De los Rios; J Salmerón-Castro; F Larrea; M Hernández-Avila Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Molly B Conroy; Jacob R Sattelmair; Nancy R Cook; JoAnn E Manson; Julie E Buring; I-Min Lee Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2009-02-27 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Pamela L Horn-Ross; Esther M John; Alison J Canchola; Susan L Stewart; Marion M Lee Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-08-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: K Basen-Engquist; C Carmack; J Brown; A Jhingran; G Baum; J Song; S Scruggs; M C Swartz; M G Cox; K H Lu Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Hannah Arem; Melinda L Irwin; Yang Zhou; Lingeng Lu; Harvey Risch; Herbert Yu Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-11-26 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Marisa A Bittoni; James L Fisher; Jeffrey M Fowler; George L Maxwell; Electra D Paskett Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: C M Dieli-Conwright; H Ma; J V Lacey; K D Henderson; S Neuhausen; P L Horn-Ross; D Deapen; J Sullivan-Halley; L Bernstein Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-07-16 Impact factor: 7.640