Literature DB >> 20406829

The Stoke CNEP saga - did it need to take so long?

Frank Wells1.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20406829      PMCID: PMC2930921          DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.10k010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Protecting whistleblowers. Employers should respond to the message, not shoot the messenger.

Authors:  G Yamey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-08

2.  Research misconduct: Britain's failure to act.

Authors:  M Farthing; R Horton; R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-16

3.  Investigating allegations of research misconduct: the vital need for due process.

Authors:  E Hey; I Chalmers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-23

4.  Panel needed to combat research fraud.

Authors:  B Christie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-06

5.  Edinburgh doctor struck off because of clinical-trial fraud.

Authors:  Peter Mitchell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-07-26       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  The UK Panel of Research Integrity: a missed opportunity.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 79.321

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  A scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases.

Authors:  Anna Catharina Vieira Armond; Bert Gordijn; Jonathan Lewis; Mohammad Hosseini; János Kristóf Bodnár; Soren Holm; Péter Kakuk
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 2.652

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.