AIMS: Evaluation of the utility of multivariate data analysis in early clinical drug development. METHODS: A multivariate chemometric approach was developed and applied for evaluating clinical laboratory parameters and biomarkers obtained from two clinical trials investigating recombinant human interleukin-21 (rIL-21) in the treatment of patients with malignant melanoma. The Phase I trial was an open-label, first-human dose escalation safety and tolerability trial with two separate dosing regimens; six cycles of thrice weekly (3/w) vs. three cycles of daily dosing for 5 days followed by 9 days of rest (5+9) in a total of 29 patients. The Phase II trial investigated efficacy and safety of the '5+9' regimen in 24 patients. RESULTS: From the Phase I trial, separate pharmacological patterns were observed for each regimen, clearly reflecting distinct properties of the two regimens. Relations between individual laboratory parameters were visualized and shown to be responsive to rIL-21 dosing. In particular, novel systematic pharmacological effects on liver function parameters as well as a bell-shaped dose-response relationship of the overall pharmacological effects were depicted. In validation of the method, multivariate pharmacological patterns discovered in the Phase I trial could be reproduced by the dataset from the Phase II trial, but not from univariate exploration of the Phase I trial. CONCLUSIONS: The new data analytical approach visualized novel correlations between laboratory parameters that points to specific pharmacological properties. This multivariate chemometric data analysis offers a novel robust, comprehensive and intuitive tool to reveal early pharmacological responses and guide selection of dose regimens.
AIMS: Evaluation of the utility of multivariate data analysis in early clinical drug development. METHODS: A multivariate chemometric approach was developed and applied for evaluating clinical laboratory parameters and biomarkers obtained from two clinical trials investigating recombinant humaninterleukin-21 (rIL-21) in the treatment of patients with malignant melanoma. The Phase I trial was an open-label, first-human dose escalation safety and tolerability trial with two separate dosing regimens; six cycles of thrice weekly (3/w) vs. three cycles of daily dosing for 5 days followed by 9 days of rest (5+9) in a total of 29 patients. The Phase II trial investigated efficacy and safety of the '5+9' regimen in 24 patients. RESULTS: From the Phase I trial, separate pharmacological patterns were observed for each regimen, clearly reflecting distinct properties of the two regimens. Relations between individual laboratory parameters were visualized and shown to be responsive to rIL-21 dosing. In particular, novel systematic pharmacological effects on liver function parameters as well as a bell-shaped dose-response relationship of the overall pharmacological effects were depicted. In validation of the method, multivariate pharmacological patterns discovered in the Phase I trial could be reproduced by the dataset from the Phase II trial, but not from univariate exploration of the Phase I trial. CONCLUSIONS: The new data analytical approach visualized novel correlations between laboratory parameters that points to specific pharmacological properties. This multivariate chemometric data analysis offers a novel robust, comprehensive and intuitive tool to reveal early pharmacological responses and guide selection of dose regimens.
Authors: Joseph Albanese; Kelly Martens; Leonid V Karanitsa; Leonid V Karkanitsa; Suzanne K Schreyer; Nicholas Dainiak Journal: Exp Hematol Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Ian D Davis; Birte K Skrumsager; Jonathan Cebon; Theo Nicholaou; John W Barlow; Niels Peter Hundahl Moller; Kresten Skak; Dorthe Lundsgaard; Klaus Stensgaard Frederiksen; Peter Thygesen; Grant A McArthur Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-06-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: John A Thompson; Brendan D Curti; Bruce G Redman; Shailender Bhatia; Jeffrey S Weber; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Eric L Sievers; Steven D Hughes; Todd A DeVries; Diana F Hausman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael G Dodds; Klaus Stensgaard Frederiksen; Kresten Skak; Lasse Tengbjerg Hansen; Dorthe Lundsgaard; John A Thompson; Steven D Hughes Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2008-10-17 Impact factor: 6.968
Authors: Klaus Stensgaard Frederiksen; Dorthe Lundsgaard; Jeremy A Freeman; Steven D Hughes; Thomas L Holm; Birte K Skrumsager; Andreas Petri; Lasse T Hansen; Grant A McArthur; Ian D Davis; Kresten Skak Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2008-02-20 Impact factor: 6.968
Authors: Yoon K Loke; Albert Ferro; Lionel D Lewis; Adam F Cohen; Andrew Somogyi; James M Ritter Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Marie Louise Max Andersen; Morten Arendt Rasmussen; Sven Pörksen; Jannet Svensson; Jennifer Vikre-Jørgensen; Jane Thomsen; Niels Thomas Hertel; Jesper Johannesen; Flemming Pociot; Jacob Sten Petersen; Lars Hansen; Henrik Bindesbøl Mortensen; Lotte Brøndum Nielsen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 3.240