Literature DB >> 20405303

Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term benefits and oncologic outcomes using more than one technique.

D W Larson1, S Y Boostrom, R R Cima, J H Pemberton, D R Larson, E J Dozois.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several minimally invasive techniques have now been described for rectal cancer resection. Current outcome data for these approaches from high volume, single institutions remain limited. Our aim was to review outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer at our institution in the current era.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was done to assess short-term benefits and oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer between 2004 and 2007.
RESULTS: One-hundred consecutive patients (61 men, median age 62) with a median follow-up of 1.8 years were identified. Sixty-seven had hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS), while 33 were done laparoscopic-assisted (LA). Seventy-two patients underwent anterior resection, 27 an abdominal perineal resection, and 1 a total proctocolectomy. Tumor stage was stage 1 (21%), stage 2 (17%), stage 3 (56%), and stage 4 (6%). A median of 16 lymph nodes, a median 3.4 cm distal margin, and a 99% negative circumferential margin was achieved. The 3-year disease-free and overall survivals were 86.2 and 94.5%, respectively. Three cases required conversion. Median time to both diet and first bowel movement was 3 days, and median length of stay was 5 days. Length of stay, time to soft diet, incision length, and pain scores were less using a LA approach compared to HALS (P < 0.01). Overall morbidity was 26% with no mortality.
CONCLUSION: Both minimally invasive techniques used achieved excellent oncologic results in patients with rectal cancer. The LA approach had slightly better short-term outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20405303     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-010-0577-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  25 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive colorectal resection outcomes: short-term comparison with open procedures.

Authors:  J Kay Noel; Kyle Fahrbach; Rhonda Estok; Catherine Cella; Diana Frame; Heather Linz; Robert R Cima; Eric J Dozois; Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results.

Authors:  Christophe Laurent; Fabien Leblanc; Philippe Wütrich; Mathieu Scheffler; Eric Rullier
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Matteo Frasson; Andrea Vignali; Walter Zuliani; Giovanni Capretti; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 5.  Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  S Breukink; J Pierie; T Wiggers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

6.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a prospective analysis of thirty-month follow-up outcomes in 312 patients.

Authors:  Seon-Hahn Kim; In-Ja Park; Yong-Geul Joh; Koo-Yong Hahn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Seung Hyuk Baik; Hye Youn Kwon; Jin Soo Kim; Hyuk Hur; Seung Kook Sohn; Chang Hwan Cho; Hoguen Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: are we there yet?

Authors:  Bradley J Champagne; Rohit Makhija
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.