AIMS: In this study we investigated the effects of the physical work environment on two physiological measures of the stress response. METHODS AND RESULTS: Circadian variations in vagally mediated heart rate variability (HRV) and the morning rise in cortisol were evaluated in 60 participants working in a government building either in a traditional (individual offices and old cubicles; n=40) or a modern workspace (individualized cubicles with improved views and lighting; n=20). Results revealed significant linear (B=-1.03; confidence interval: -1.05 to -1.01, P<0.05) and quadratic (B=1.001; confidence interval: 1.0004-1.002, P<0.05) trends by office type interactions for indices of vagally mediated HRV. Individuals in the old office space had flatter slopes and thus less circadian variation including less HRV at night, and a larger rise in cortisol upon awakening compared with those in the new office space. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that physical features of the work environment may affect two aspects of the physiological stress response: circadian variations in HRV and the morning rise in cortisol. These findings have important social, economic, and public health implications for work environment risk factors on health.
AIMS: In this study we investigated the effects of the physical work environment on two physiological measures of the stress response. METHODS AND RESULTS: Circadian variations in vagally mediated heart rate variability (HRV) and the morning rise in cortisol were evaluated in 60 participants working in a government building either in a traditional (individual offices and old cubicles; n=40) or a modern workspace (individualized cubicles with improved views and lighting; n=20). Results revealed significant linear (B=-1.03; confidence interval: -1.05 to -1.01, P<0.05) and quadratic (B=1.001; confidence interval: 1.0004-1.002, P<0.05) trends by office type interactions for indices of vagally mediated HRV. Individuals in the old office space had flatter slopes and thus less circadian variation including less HRV at night, and a larger rise in cortisol upon awakening compared with those in the new office space. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that physical features of the work environment may affect two aspects of the physiological stress response: circadian variations in HRV and the morning rise in cortisol. These findings have important social, economic, and public health implications for work environment risk factors on health.
Authors: Zhibin Li; Harold Snieder; Shaoyong Su; Xiuhua Ding; Julian F Thayer; Frank A Treiber; Xiaoling Wang Journal: Int J Psychophysiol Date: 2009-03-10 Impact factor: 2.997
Authors: Martica Hall; Raymond Vasko; Daniel Buysse; Hernando Ombao; Qingxia Chen; J David Cashmere; David Kupfer; Julian F Thayer Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Saskia F A Duijts; Ijmert Kant; Gerard M H Swaen; Piet A van den Brandt; Maurice P A Zeegers Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2007-08-23 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Bart Verkuil; Jos F Brosschot; Andrea H Marques; Kevin Kampschroer; Esther M Sternberg; Julian F Thayer Journal: Psychophysiology Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Frederick O Foote; Herbert Benson; Ann Berger; Brian Berman; James DeLeo; Patricia A Deuster; David J Lary; Marni N Silverman; Esther M Sternberg Journal: Glob Adv Health Med Date: 2018-02-20
Authors: Casey M Lindberg; Karthik Srinivasan; Brian Gilligan; Javad Razjouyan; Hyoki Lee; Bijan Najafi; Kelli J Canada; Matthias R Mehl; Faiz Currim; Sudha Ram; Melissa M Lunden; Judith H Heerwagen; Kevin Kampschroer; Esther M Sternberg Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2018-08-20 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Harri Lindholm; Jari Ahlberg; Juha Sinisalo; Christer Hublin; Ari Hirvonen; Markku Partinen; Seppo Sarna; Aslak Savolainen Journal: Sleep Disord Date: 2012-06-18
Authors: Bernhard Schwartz; Jay M Kapellusch; Andreas Schrempf; Kathrin Probst; Michael Haller; Arnold Baca Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 3.295