Literature DB >> 20404229

A randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of online follow-up visits in the management of acne.

Alice J Watson1, Hagit Bergman, Christy M Williams, Joseph C Kvedar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether delivering acne follow-up care via an asynchronous, remote online visit (e-visit) platform produces equivalent clinical outcomes to office care.
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized controlled study.
SETTING: Two teaching hospitals in Boston between September 2005 and May 2007. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 151 patients with mild to moderate facial acne.
INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were asked to carry out 4 follow-up visits using either an e-visit platform or conventional office care. At 6-week intervals, subjects in the e-visit group were prompted to send images of their skin and an update, via a secure Web site, to their dermatologist. Dermatologists responded with advice and electronic prescriptions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was change in total inflammatory lesion count between the first and last visit. The major secondary outcomes were subject and dermatologist satisfaction with care and length of time to complete visits.
RESULTS: The mean age of subjects was 28 years; most were female (78%), white (65%), and college educated (69%). One hundred twenty-one of the initial 151 subjects completed the study. The decrease in total inflammatory lesion count was similar in the e-visit and office visit groups (6.67 and 9.39, respectively) (P = .49). Both subjects and dermatologists reported comparable satisfaction with care regardless of visit type (P = .06 and P = .16, respectively). Compared with office visits, e-visits were time saving for subjects and time neutral for dermatologists (4 minutes, 8 seconds vs 4 minutes, 42 seconds) (P = .57).
CONCLUSION: Delivering follow-up care to acne patients via an e-visit platform produced clinical outcomes equivalent to those of conventional office visits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20404229     DOI: 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  7 in total

Review 1.  The Empirical Foundations of Teledermatology: A Review of the Research Evidence.

Authors:  Rashid L Bashshur; Gary W Shannon; Trilokraj Tejasvi; Joseph C Kvedar; Michael Gates
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  Using Network Oriented Research Assistant (NORA) Technology to Compare Digital Photographic With In-Person Assessment of Acne Vulgaris.

Authors:  Hannah M Singer; Timothy Almazan; Noah Craft; Consuelo V David; Samantha Eells; Crisel Erfe; Cynthia Lazzaro; Kathy Nguyen; Katy Preciado; Belinda Tan; Vishal A Patel
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 10.282

3.  Patient-centered online management of psoriasis: a randomized controlled equivalency trial.

Authors:  Cindy J Chambers; Kory K Parsi; Clayton Schupp; April W Armstrong
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  Impact of Asynchronous Electronic Communication-Based Visits on Clinical Outcomes and Health Care Delivery: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Oliver T Nguyen; Amir Alishahi Tabriz; Jinhai Huo; Karim Hanna; Christopher M Shea; Kea Turner
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Teledermatology for diagnosing skin cancer in adults.

Authors:  Naomi Chuchu; Jacqueline Dinnes; Yemisi Takwoingi; Rubeta N Matin; Susan E Bayliss; Clare Davenport; Jacqueline F Moreau; Oliver Bassett; Kathie Godfrey; Colette O'Sullivan; Fiona M Walter; Richard Motley; Jonathan J Deeks; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04

6.  Implementation and evaluation of Stanford Health Care direct-care teledermatology program.

Authors:  Akhilesh S Pathipati; Justin M Ko
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2016-07-12

7.  Using Smart Technology to Improve Outcomes in Myocardial Infarction Patients: Rationale and Design of a Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial, The Box.

Authors:  Roderick Willem Treskes; Louise Anna van Winden; Nicole van Keulen; Douwe Ekke Atsma; Enno Tjeerd van der Velde; Elske van den Akker-van Marle; Bart Mertens; Martin Jan Schalij
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-09-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.