Literature DB >> 20404219

Amlodipine-valsartan combination decreases central systolic blood pressure more effectively than the amlodipine-atenolol combination: the EXPLOR study.

Pierre Boutouyrie1, Assya Achouba, Patrick Trunet, Stéphane Laurent.   

Abstract

The beta-blocker atenolol is less effective than angiotensin-receptor blockers and calcium-channel blockers for reducing central blood pressure (BP). The trial was designed to determine whether the advantages of angiotensin-receptor blockers over atenolol remained significant when both were combined with the calcium-channel blocker amlodipine. A prospective, randomized, blinded endpoint (PROBE design) parallel group, multicenter trial including 393 patients with essential hypertension resistant to 4 weeks of 5 mg of amlodipine was set out. Central systolic BP, augmentation index (AIx; either rough or adjusted on heart rate), and carotid-to-femoral pulse wave velocity were measured with applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor) at inclusion and after 8 and 24 weeks of active treatment with an amlodipine-valsartan combination (5/80 mg and then 10/160 mg) or an amlodipine-atenolol combination (5/50 mg and then 10/100 mg). From baseline to week 24, central systolic BP decreased significantly more in the amlodipine-valsartan group (-13.70+/-1.15 mm Hg; P<0.0001) than in the amlodipine-atenolol group (-9.70+/-1.10 mm Hg; P<0.0001; difference: -4.00 mm Hg [95% CI: -7.10 to -0.90]; P=0.013), despite similar changes in brachial systolic BP. The difference in rough AIx reduction was -6.5% (95% CI: -8.3 to -4.7; P<0.0001) in favor of amlodipine-valsartan. AIx adjusted on heart rate was significantly reduced in favor of amlodipine-valsartan (-2.8% [95% CI: -4.92 to -0.68]; P<0.01). Heart rate decreased significantly more with amlodipine-atenolol (difference: -11 bpm [95% CI: -14 to -8 bpm]; P<0.001). Pulse wave velocity decreased by 0.95 m/s in both groups with no significant difference. Differences in central systolic BP and rough AIx remained significant after adjustment to the changes in heart rate. The amlodipine-valsartan combination decreased central (systolic and pulse) pressure and AIx more than the amlodipine-atenolol combination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20404219     DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.148999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  61 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis of the comparative effects of different classes of antihypertensive agents on brachial and central systolic blood pressure, and augmentation index.

Authors:  Charlotte H Manisty; Alun D Hughes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Impact of Antihypertensive Agents on Central Systolic Blood Pressure and Augmentation Index: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tracey J McGaughey; Emily A Fletcher; Sachin A Shah
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.689

3.  Effect of Amlodipine/Valsartan Versus Nebivolol/Valsartan Fixed Dose Combinations on Peripheral and Central Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Selvia M Farag; Hoda M Rabea; Hesham B Mahmoud
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2018-11-03

4.  Should thiazide diuretics be given as first line antihypertensive therapy or in addition to other medications?

Authors:  Valentina Trimarco; Raffaele Izzo; Teresa Migliore; Francesco Rozza; Marina Marino; Maria Virginia Manzi; Marina De Marco; Giovanni de Simone; Nicola De Luca
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2014-06-24

Review 5.  Pharmacological modulation of arterial stiffness.

Authors:  Pierre Boutouyrie; Patrick Lacolley; Marie Briet; Véronique Regnault; Alice Stanton; Stéphane Laurent; Azra Mahmud
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Ten-year longitudinal change in aortic stiffness assessed by cardiac MRI in the second half of the human lifespan: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Ohyama; Gisela Teixido-Tura; Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; Chikara Noda; Atul R Chugh; Chia-Ying Liu; Alban Redheuil; R Brandon Stacey; Harry Dietz; Antoinette S Gomes; Martin R Prince; Arturo Evangelista; Colin O Wu; W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; Joao A C Lima
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 7.  Treatment of hypertension and metabolic syndrome: lowering blood pressure is not enough for organ protection, new approach-arterial destiffening.

Authors:  Reuven Zimlichman
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.369

8.  Identification of Distinct Arterial Waveform Clusters and a Longitudinal Evaluation of Their Clinical Usefulness.

Authors:  John D Sluyter; Alun D Hughes; Carlos A Camargo; Simon A McG Thom; Kim H Parker; Bernhard Hametner; Siegfried Wassertheurer; Robert Scragg
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 9.  Vascular ageing and interventions: lessons and learnings.

Authors:  Bryan Williams
Journal:  Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2016-04-20

Review 10.  Treatment of arterial remodeling in essential hypertension.

Authors:  Marie Briet; Ernesto L Schiffrin
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.