| Literature DB >> 20404189 |
Christopher J Costello1, Michael G Neubert, Stephen A Polasky, Andrew R Solow.
Abstract
It has been argued recently that the combination of risk aversion and an uncertainty distribution of future temperature change with a heavy upper tail invalidates mainstream economic analyses of climate change policy. A simple model is used to explore the effect of imposing an upper bound on future temperature change. The analysis shows that imposing even a high bound reverses the earlier argument and that the optimal policy, as measured by the willingness to pay to avoid climate change, is relatively insensitive to this bound over a wide range.Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20404189 PMCID: PMC2889512 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0911488107
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205