PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to examine the role of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signaling pathway in the response of ovarian cancer cells to Taxol and to evaluate the significance of this pathway in human epithelial ovarian tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The effect of Taxol treatment on AKT activation in A2780 ovarian carcinoma cells was evaluated using antibodies specific for phospho-AKT. To study the drug-resistant phenotype, we developed a Taxol-resistant cell line, HEY-T30, derived from HEY ovarian carcinoma cells. IGF2 expression was measured by real-time PCR. A type 1 IGF receptor (IGF1R) inhibitor, NVP-AEW541, and IGF2 small interfering RNA were used to evaluate the effect of IGF pathway inhibition on proliferation and Taxol sensitivity. IGF2 protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 115 epithelial ovarian tumors and analyzed in relation to clinical/pathologic factors using the chi(2) or Fisher's exact tests. The influence of IGF2 expression on survival was studied with Cox regression. RESULTS: Taxol-induced AKT phosphorylation required IGF1R tyrosine kinase activity and was associated with upregulation of IGF2. Resistant cells had higher IGF2 expression compared with sensitive cells, and IGF pathway inhibition restored sensitivity to Taxol. High IGF2 tumor expression correlated with advanced stage (P < 0.001) and tumor grade (P < 0.01) and reduced disease-free survival (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: IGF2 modulates Taxol resistance, and tumor IGF2 expression is a candidate prognostic biomarker in epithelial ovarian tumors. IGF pathway inhibition sensitizes drug-resistant ovarian carcinoma cells to Taxol. Such novel findings suggest that IGF2 represents a therapeutic target in ovarian cancer, particularly in the setting of Taxol resistance. Copyright 2010 AACR.
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to examine the role of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signaling pathway in the response of ovarian cancer cells to Taxol and to evaluate the significance of this pathway in humanepithelial ovarian tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The effect of Taxol treatment on AKT activation in A2780ovarian carcinoma cells was evaluated using antibodies specific for phospho-AKT. To study the drug-resistant phenotype, we developed a Taxol-resistant cell line, HEY-T30, derived from HEY ovarian carcinoma cells. IGF2 expression was measured by real-time PCR. A type 1 IGF receptor (IGF1R) inhibitor, NVP-AEW541, and IGF2 small interfering RNA were used to evaluate the effect of IGF pathway inhibition on proliferation and Taxol sensitivity. IGF2 protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 115 epithelial ovarian tumors and analyzed in relation to clinical/pathologic factors using the chi(2) or Fisher's exact tests. The influence of IGF2 expression on survival was studied with Cox regression. RESULTS:Taxol-induced AKT phosphorylation required IGF1R tyrosine kinase activity and was associated with upregulation of IGF2. Resistant cells had higher IGF2 expression compared with sensitive cells, and IGF pathway inhibition restored sensitivity to Taxol. High IGF2tumor expression correlated with advanced stage (P < 0.001) and tumor grade (P < 0.01) and reduced disease-free survival (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:IGF2 modulates Taxol resistance, and tumorIGF2 expression is a candidate prognostic biomarker in epithelial ovarian tumors. IGF pathway inhibition sensitizes drug-resistant ovarian carcinoma cells to Taxol. Such novel findings suggest that IGF2 represents a therapeutic target in ovarian cancer, particularly in the setting of Taxol resistance. Copyright 2010 AACR.
Authors: Robyn A Sayer; Johnathan M Lancaster; Jennifer Pittman; Jonathon Gray; Regina Whitaker; Jeffrey R Marks; Andrew Berchuck Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Hayley M McDaid; Lluis Lopez-Barcons; Aaron Grossman; Marie Lia; Steven Keller; Román Pérez-Soler; Susan Band Horwitz Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-04-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: H Dudek; S R Datta; T F Franke; M J Birnbaum; R Yao; G M Cooper; R A Segal; D R Kaplan; M E Greenberg Journal: Science Date: 1997-01-31 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Gil Mor; Irene Visintin; Yinglei Lai; Hongyu Zhao; Peter Schwartz; Thomas Rutherford; Luo Yue; Patricia Bray-Ward; David C Ward Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-05-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Erin R King; Zhifei Zu; Yvonne T M Tsang; Michael T Deavers; Anais Malpica; Samuel C Mok; David M Gershenson; Kwong-Kwok Wong Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2011-07-02 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Hye-Young Min; Su-Chan Lee; Jong Kyu Woo; Hyun Jin Jung; Kwan Hee Park; Hae Min Jeong; Seung Yeob Hyun; Jaebeom Cho; Wooin Lee; Ji Eun Park; So Jung Kwon; Hyo-Jong Lee; Xiao Ni; Young Kee Shin; Faye M Johnson; Madeleine Duvic; Ho-Young Lee Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: A R M Ruhul Amin; Phillip A Karpowicz; Thomas E Carey; Jack Arbiser; Rita Nahta; Zhuo G Chen; Jin-Tang Dong; Omer Kucuk; Gazala N Khan; Gloria S Huang; Shijun Mi; Ho-Young Lee; Joerg Reichrath; Kanya Honoki; Alexandros G Georgakilas; Amedeo Amedei; Amr Amin; Bill Helferich; Chandra S Boosani; Maria Rosa Ciriolo; Sophie Chen; Sulma I Mohammed; Asfar S Azmi; W Nicol Keith; Dipita Bhakta; Dorota Halicka; Elena Niccolai; Hiromasa Fujii; Katia Aquilano; S Salman Ashraf; Somaira Nowsheen; Xujuan Yang; Alan Bilsland; Dong M Shin Journal: Semin Cancer Biol Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 15.707
Authors: Pedro J Beltran; Frank J Calzone; Petia Mitchell; Young-Ah Chung; Elaina Cajulis; Gordon Moody; Brian Belmontes; Chi-Ming Li; Steven Vonderfecht; Victor E Velculescu; Guorong Yang; Jingwei Qi; Dennis J Slamon; Gottfried E Konecny Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-04-11 Impact factor: 12.531