Literature DB >> 20404005

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 mutation analysis on voided urine for surveillance of patients with low-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Tahlita C M Zuiverloon1, Madelon N M van der Aa, Theo H van der Kwast, Ewout W Steyerberg, Hester F Lingsma, Chris H Bangma, Ellen C Zwarthoff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mutations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) have been found in 70% of the low-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMI-BC) tumors. We aim to determine the potential of FGFR3 mutation analysis on voided urine to detect recurrences during surveillance of patients with low-grade NMI-BC. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: FGFR3 mutation status of the study inclusion tumor was determined from 200 low-grade NMI-BC patients. Patients with an FGFR3-mutant inclusion tumor were selected for analysis and monitored by cystoscopy, and voided urine samples were collected. FGFR3 mutation analysis was done on 463 prospectively collected urines. Sensitivity and predictive value of the assay were determined for detection of concomitant recurrences. Longitudinal and Cox time-to-event analyses were done to determine the predictive value for detection of future recurrences.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 3.5 years. The sensitivity of the assay for detection of concomitant recurrences was 26 of 45 (58%). Of the 105 positive urine samples, 85 (81%) were associated with a concomitant or a future recurrence. An FGFR3-positive urine was associated with a 3.8-fold (P < 0.0001) higher risk of having a recurrence in the Cox analysis. In contrast, only 41 of 358 (11%) FGFR3-negative urine samples were associated with a recurrence. Positive predictive value increased from 25% to 90% in patients having consecutive FGFR3-positive urine tests.
CONCLUSIONS: FGFR3 mutation analysis on voided urine is a simple and noninvasive diagnostic method for detection of recurrences during surveillance of patients presenting with a low-grade FGFR3-mutant NMI-BC tumor. Copyright 2010 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20404005     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-3013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  35 in total

Review 1.  [Urine cytology - update 2013. A systematic review of recent literature].

Authors:  M Böhm; F vom Dorp; M Schostak; O W Hakenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Chromosome 4p16.3 variant modify bladder cancer risk in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Meilin Wang; Haiyan Chu; Fu Yan; Chao Qin; Pu Li; Lin Yuan; Changjun Yin; Jianfeng Xu; Zhengdong Zhang
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 3.  Current Use and Promise of Urinary Markers for Urothelial Cancer.

Authors:  William Tabayoyong; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Reduced immunohistochemical PTEN staining is associated with higher progression rate and recurrence episodes in non-invasive low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Ibrahim Kulac; Sehbal Arslankoz; George J Netto; Dilek Ertoy Baydar
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Challenges of urine-based molecular assays for the detection of urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Joep J de Jong; Kim E M van Kessel; Monique J Roobol; Joost L Boormans
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-12

Review 6.  Molecular biomarkers in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: are we there yet?

Authors:  George J Netto
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Urinary protein biomarker panel for the detection of recurrent bladder cancer.

Authors:  Charles J Rosser; Myron Chang; Yunfeng Dai; Shanti Ross; Lourdes Mengual; Antonio Alcaraz; Steve Goodison
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 8.  Emerging critical role of molecular testing in diagnostic genitourinary pathology.

Authors:  George J Netto; Liang Cheng
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  FGFR3, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS and PIK3CA mutations in bladder cancer and their potential as biomarkers for surveillance and therapy.

Authors:  Lucie C Kompier; Irene Lurkin; Madelon N M van der Aa; Bas W G van Rhijn; Theo H van der Kwast; Ellen C Zwarthoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A noninvasive multianalyte urine-based diagnostic assay for urothelial cancer of the bladder in the evaluation of hematuria.

Authors:  R Jeffrey Karnes; Cecilia A Fernandez; Anthony P Shuber
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 7.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.