Literature DB >> 20403779

An invasive and a noninvasive approach for the automatic differentiation of obstructive and central hypopneas.

Christian Morgenstern1, Matthias Schwaibold, Winfried J Randerath, Armin Bolz, Raimon Jané.   

Abstract

The automatic differentiation of obstructive and central respiratory events is a major challenge in the diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing. Esophageal pressure (Pes) measurement is the gold-standard method to identify these events. This study presents a new classifier that automatically differentiates obstructive and central hypopneas with the Pes signal and a new approach for an automatic noninvasive classifier with nasal airflow. An overall of 28 patients underwent night polysomnography with Pes recording, and a total of 769 hypopneas were manually scored by human experts to create a gold-standard annotation set. Features were automatically extracted from the Pes signal to train and test the classifiers (discriminant analysis, support vector machines, and adaboost). After a significantly (p < 0.01) higher incidence of inspiratory flow limitation episodes in obstructive hypopneas was objectively, invasively assessed compared to central hypopneas, the feasibility of an automatic noninvasive classifier with features extracted from the airflow signal was demonstrated. The automatic invasive classifier achieved a mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.90 after a 100-fold cross validation. The automatic noninvasive feasibility study obtained similar hypopnea differentiation results as a manual noninvasive classification algorithm. Hence, both systems seem promising for the automatic differentiation of obstructive and central hypopneas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20403779     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2047505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  7 in total

1.  Obstructive pressure peak: a new method for differentiation of obstructive and central apneas under auto-CPAP therapy.

Authors:  K H Ruhle; U Domanski; G Nilius
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  Use of Chest Wall EMG to Classify Hypopneas as Obstructive or Central.

Authors:  Richard B Berry; Scott Ryals; Mary H Wagner
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 3.  A review of signals used in sleep analysis.

Authors:  A Roebuck; V Monasterio; E Gederi; M Osipov; J Behar; A Malhotra; T Penzel; G D Clifford
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.833

4.  Relative prolongation of inspiratory time predicts high versus low resistance categorization of hypopneas.

Authors:  Anne M Mooney; Khader K Abounasr; David M Rapoport; Indu Ayappa
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 4.062

5.  Evaluation of a noninvasive algorithm for differentiation of obstructive and central hypopneas.

Authors:  Winfried J Randerath; Marcel Treml; Christina Priegnitz; Sven Stieglitz; Lars Hagmeyer; Christian Morgenstern
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 6.  Computer-Assisted Diagnosis of the Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome: A Review.

Authors:  Diego Alvarez-Estevez; Vicente Moret-Bonillo
Journal:  Sleep Disord       Date:  2015-07-21

7.  A comparison of 2 visual methods for classifying obstructive vs central hypopneas.

Authors:  Kara L Dupuy-McCauley; Harsha V Mudrakola; Brendon Colaco; Vichaya Arunthari; Katarzyna A Slota; Timothy I Morgenthaler
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.324

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.