Literature DB >> 20403479

Prognostic implications of bundle branch block in patients undergoing primary coronary angioplasty in the stent era.

David Vivas1, María Jose Pérez-Vizcayno, Rosana Hernández-Antolín, Antonio Fernández-Ortiz, Camino Bañuelos, Javier Escaned, Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo, Jose Alberto De Agustín, Ivan Núñez-Gil, Juan Jose González-Ferrer, Carlos Macaya, Fernando Alfonso.   

Abstract

The presence of bundle branch block (BBB) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction has been associated with a poor outcome. However, the implications of BBB in patients undergoing primary angioplasty in the stent era are poorly established. Furthermore, the prognostic implications of BBB type (right vs left and previous vs transient or persistent) remain unknown. We analyzed the data from 913 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. All clinical, electrocardiographic, and angiographic data were prospectively collected. The median follow-up period was 19 months. The primary end point was the combined outcome of death and reinfarction. BBB was documented in 140 patients (15%). Right BBB (RBBB) was present in 119 patients (13%) and was previous in 27 (23%), persistent in 45 (38%), and transient in 47 (39%). Left BBB (LBBB) was present in 21 patients (2%) and was previous in 8 (38%), persistent in 9 (43%), and transient in 4 (19%). Patients with BBB were older, and more frequently had diabetes, anterior infarctions, a greater Killip class, a lower left ventricular ejection fraction, and greater mortality (all p <0.005) than patients without BBB. The short- and long-term primary outcome occurred more frequently in patients with persistent RBBB/LBBB than in those with previous or transient RBBB/LBBB. On multivariate analysis, persistent RBBB/LBBB emerged as an independent predictor of death and reinfarction. In conclusion, in patients undergoing primary angioplasty in the stent era, BBB is associated with poor short- and long-term prognosis. This risk appears to be particularly high among patients with persistent BBB. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20403479     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.12.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

1.  Significance of an isolated new right bundle branch block in a patient with chest pain.

Authors:  Geraldine Gilliot; Pierre Monney; Olivier Muller; Olivier Hugli
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-06-08

Review 2.  Prognostic Significance of Right Bundle Branch Block for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Li Xiang; Anyuan Zhong; Tao You; Jianchang Chen; Weiting Xu; Minhua Shi
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-03-27

3.  What we have learned from the ESC position paper on arrhythmias in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Bülent Görenek; Gulmira Kudaiberdieva; Gregory Lip
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.596

4.  Prognostic value of new-onset right bundle-branch block in acute myocardial infarction patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Juntao Wang; Hongxing Luo; Chunling Kong; Shujuan Dong; Jingchao Li; Haijia Yu; Yingjie Chu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Prognostic impact of right bundle branch block in hospitalized patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: a single-center cohort study.

Authors:  Li Lai; Rong Jiang; Wei Fang; Chao Yan; Yibin Tang; Wei Hua; Michael Fu; Xiaoping Li; Rong Luo
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-10-14       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in women with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Edyta Radomska; Marcin Sadowski; Jacek Kurzawski; Marek Gierlotka; Lech Polonski
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 19.112

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.