BACKGROUND:Sublingual buprenorphine is an effective maintenance treatment for opioid dependence, yet intravenous buprenorphine misuse occurs. A buprenorphine/naloxone formulation was developed to mitigate this misuse risk. This randomized, double-blind, cross-over study was conducted to assess the intravenous abuse potential of buprenorphine/naloxone compared with buprenorphine in buprenorphine-maintained injection drug users (IDUs). METHODS:Intravenous heroin users (n = 12) lived in the hospital for 8-9 weeks and were maintained on each of three different sublingual buprenorphine doses (2 mg, 8 mg, 24 mg). Under each maintenance dose, participants completed laboratory sessions during which the reinforcing and subjective effects of intravenous placebo, naloxone, heroin and low and high doses of buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone were examined. Every participant received each test dose under the three buprenorphine maintenance dose conditions. RESULTS: Intravenous buprenorphine/naloxone was self-administered less frequently than buprenorphine or heroin (P < 0.0005). Participants were most likely to self-administer drug intravenously when maintained on the lowest sublingual buprenorphine dose. Subjective ratings of 'drug liking' and 'desire to take the drug again' were lower for buprenorphine/naloxone than for buprenorphine or heroin (P = 0.0001). Participants reported that they would pay significantly less money for buprenorphine/naloxone than for buprenorphine or heroin (P < 0.05). Seven adverse events were reported; most were mild and transient. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that although the buprenorphine/naloxone combination has intravenous abuse potential, that potential is lower than it is for buprenorphine alone, particularly when participants received higher maintenance doses and lower buprenorphine/naloxone challenge doses. Buprenorphine/naloxone may be a reasonable option for managing the risk for buprenorphine misuse during opioid dependence treatment.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Sublingual buprenorphine is an effective maintenance treatment for opioid dependence, yet intravenous buprenorphine misuse occurs. A buprenorphine/naloxone formulation was developed to mitigate this misuse risk. This randomized, double-blind, cross-over study was conducted to assess the intravenous abuse potential of buprenorphine/naloxone compared with buprenorphine in buprenorphine-maintained injection drug users (IDUs). METHODS: Intravenous heroin users (n = 12) lived in the hospital for 8-9 weeks and were maintained on each of three different sublingual buprenorphine doses (2 mg, 8 mg, 24 mg). Under each maintenance dose, participants completed laboratory sessions during which the reinforcing and subjective effects of intravenous placebo, naloxone, heroin and low and high doses of buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone were examined. Every participant received each test dose under the three buprenorphine maintenance dose conditions. RESULTS: Intravenous buprenorphine/naloxone was self-administered less frequently than buprenorphine or heroin (P < 0.0005). Participants were most likely to self-administer drug intravenously when maintained on the lowest sublingual buprenorphine dose. Subjective ratings of 'drug liking' and 'desire to take the drug again' were lower for buprenorphine/naloxone than for buprenorphine or heroin (P = 0.0001). Participants reported that they would pay significantly less money for buprenorphine/naloxone than for buprenorphine or heroin (P < 0.05). Seven adverse events were reported; most were mild and transient. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that although the buprenorphine/naloxone combination has intravenous abuse potential, that potential is lower than it is for buprenorphine alone, particularly when participants received higher maintenance doses and lower buprenorphine/naloxone challenge doses. Buprenorphine/naloxone may be a reasonable option for managing the risk for buprenorphine misuse during opioid dependence treatment.
Authors: David A Fiellin; Michael V Pantalon; Marek C Chawarski; Brent A Moore; Lynn E Sullivan; Patrick G O'Connor; Richard S Schottenfeld Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-07-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: T Eissenberg; R E Johnson; G E Bigelow; S L Walsh; I A Liebson; E C Strain; M L Stitzer Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 1997-04-14 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Maria Patrizia Carrieri; Leslie Amass; Gregory M Lucas; David Vlahov; Alex Wodak; George E Woody Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2006-12-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Perrine Roux; Claudia Tindall; Lionel Fugon; Janet Murray; Suzanne K Vosburg; Phillip Saccone; Maria A Sullivan; Jeanne M Manubay; Ziva D Cooper; Jermaine D Jones; Richard W Foltin; Sandra D Comer Journal: Addiction Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Jermaine D Jones; Maria A Sullivan; Suzanne K Vosburg; Jeanne M Manubay; Shanthi Mogali; Verena Metz; Sandra D Comer Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2014-07-25 Impact factor: 4.280
Authors: Sunmee Wee; Leandro F Vendruscolo; Kaushik K Misra; Joel E Schlosburg; George F Koob Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2012-08-08 Impact factor: 17.956