Literature DB >> 20402542

Cost effectiveness of donepezil in the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: a UK evaluation using discrete-event simulation.

Denis Getsios1, Steve Blume, K Jack Ishak, Grant D H Maclaine.   

Abstract

Recommendations in the UK suggest restricting treatment of Alzheimer's disease with cholinesterase inhibitors, on cost-effectiveness grounds, to patients with moderate cognitive decline. As the economic analyses that informed these recommendations have been the subject of debate, we sought to address the potential limitations of existing models and produce estimates of donepezil treatment cost effectiveness in the UK using the most recent available data and simulation techniques. A discrete-event simulation was developed that predicts progression of Alzheimer's disease through correlated changes in cognition, behavioural disturbance and function. Patient-level data from seven randomized, placebo-controlled donepezil trials and a 7-year follow-up registry provided the basis for modeling longitudinal outcomes. Individuals in the simulation were assigned unique demographic and clinical characteristics and then followed for 10 years, with severity of disease tracked on continuous scales. Patient mix and costs were developed from UK-specific literature. Analyses were run for severity subgroups to evaluate outcomes for sub-populations with disease of mild versus moderate severity from both a healthcare payer and societal perspective. All costs are reported in pound, year 2007 values, and all outcomes are discounted at 3.5% per annum. Over 10 years, treatment of all patients with mild to moderate disease reduces overall direct medical costs by an average of over pound2300 per patient. When unpaid caregiver time is also taken into consideration, savings increase to over pound4700 per patient. Compared with untreated patients, patients receiving donepezil experience a discounted gain in QALYs averaging 0.11, with their caregivers gaining, on average, 0.01 QALYs. For the subset of patients starting treatment with more severe disease, savings are more modest, averaging about pound1600 and pound3750 from healthcare and societal perspectives, respectively. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, donepezil dominated no treatment between 57% and 62% of replications when only medical costs were considered, and between 74% and 79% of replications when indirect costs were included, with results more favourable for treatment initiation in the mild versus moderate severity stages of the disease. Although the simulation results are not definitive, they suggest that donepezil leads to health benefits and cost savings when used to treat mild to moderately severe Alzheimer's disease in the UK. They also indicate that both benefits and savings may be greatest when treatment is started while patients are still in the mild stages of Alzheimer's disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20402542     DOI: 10.2165/11531870-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  30 in total

1.  A 24-week, randomized, double-blind study of donepezil in moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  H Feldman; S Gauthier; J Hecker; B Vellas; P Subbiah; E Whalen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-08-28       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.

Authors:  John Brazier; Jennifer Roberts; Mark Deverill
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Predictive validity of neuropsychiatric subgroups on nursing home placement and survival in patients with Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Saw-Myo Tun; Daniel L Murman; Heidi L Long; Christopher C Colenda; Alexander von Eye
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.105

4.  Appeal Court rules that NICE procedure was unfair.

Authors:  Clare Dyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-05-10

5.  3-year study of donepezil therapy in Alzheimer's disease: effects of early and continuous therapy.

Authors:  B Winblad; A Wimo; K Engedal; H Soininen; F Verhey; G Waldemar; A-L Wetterholm; A Haglund; R Zhang; R Schindler
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord       Date:  2006-02-27       Impact factor: 2.959

6.  A 1-year, placebo-controlled preservation of function survival study of donepezil in AD patients.

Authors:  R C Mohs; R S Doody; J C Morris; J R Ieni; S L Rogers; C A Perdomo; R D Pratt
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-08-14       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Modelling mini mental state examination changes in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  M S Mendiondo; J W Ashford; R J Kryscio; F A Schmitt
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000 Jun 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 8.  Modelling disease progression in Alzheimer's disease: a review of modelling methods used for cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Colin Green
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Treatment of a whole population sample of Alzheimer's disease with donepezil over a 4-year period: lessons learned.

Authors:  Sarah Lyle; Moni Grizzell; Sasi Willmott; Susan Benbow; Michael Clark; David Jolley
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.959

10.  Assessment of health economics in Alzheimer's disease (AHEAD): treatment with galantamine in the UK.

Authors:  A Ward; J J Caro; D Getsios; K Ishak; J O'Brien; R Bullock
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.485

View more
  22 in total

1.  How to include informal care in economic evaluations.

Authors:  Renske J Hoefman; Job van Exel; Werner Brouwer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Evaluating disease-modifying agents: a simulation framework for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Shien Guo; Denis Getsios; Nikhil Revankar; Peng Xu; Gwilym Thompson; Joel Bobula; Loretto Lacey; Maren Gaudig
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  When to use discrete event simulation (DES) for the economic evaluation of health technologies? A review and critique of the costs and benefits of DES.

Authors:  Jonathan Karnon; Hossein Haji Ali Afzali
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Systematic Review of Model-Based Economic Evaluations of Treatments for Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Luis Hernandez; Asli Ozen; Rodrigo DosSantos; Denis Getsios
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Economic evaluation of treatment options in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses.

Authors:  Laura Pouryamout; Judith Dams; Juergen Wasem; Richard Dodel; Anja Neumann
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Family and Caregiver Spillover Effects in Cost-Utility Analyses of Alzheimer's Disease Interventions.

Authors:  Pei-Jung Lin; Brittany D'Cruz; Ashley A Leech; Peter J Neumann; Myrlene Sanon Aigbogun; Dorothee Oberdhan; Tara A Lavelle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  The estimation of utility weights in cost-utility analysis for mental disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Sonntag; Hans-Helmut König; Alexander Konnopka
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  How relevant are social costs in economic evaluations? The case of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  L M Peña-Longobardo; B Rodríguez-Sánchez; J Oliva-Moreno; I Aranda-Reneo; J López-Bastida
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2019-07-24

9.  Evaluating the cost effectiveness of donepezil in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease in Germany using discrete event simulation.

Authors:  Susanne Hartz; Denis Getsios; Sunning Tao; Steve Blume; Grant Maclaine
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.474

10.  Florbetaben PET in the Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease: A Discrete Event Simulation to Explore Its Potential Value and Key Data Gaps.

Authors:  Shien Guo; Denis Getsios; Luis Hernandez; Kelly Cho; Elizabeth Lawler; Arman Altincatal; Stephan Lanes; Michael Blankenburg
Journal:  Int J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2012-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.