Literature DB >> 20401157

Is Inequality Among Universities Increasing? Gini Coefficients and the Elusive Rise of Elite Universities.

Willem Halffman, Loet Leydesdorff.   

Abstract

One of the unintended consequences of the New Public Management (NPM) in universities is often feared to be a division between elite institutions focused on research and large institutions with teaching missions. However, institutional isomorphisms provide counter-incentives. For example, university rankings focus on certain output parameters such as publications, but not on others (e.g., patents). In this study, we apply Gini coefficients to university rankings in order to assess whether universities are becoming more unequal, at the level of both the world and individual nations. Our results do not support the thesis that universities are becoming more unequal. If anything, we predominantly find homogenisation, both at the level of the global comparisons and nationally. In a more restricted dataset (using only publications in the natural and life sciences), we find increasing inequality for those countries, which used NPM during the 1990s, but not during the 2000s. Our findings suggest that increased output steering from the policy side leads to a global conformation to performance standards.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20401157      PMCID: PMC2850525          DOI: 10.1007/s11024-010-9141-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva        ISSN: 0026-4695


  1 in total

1.  The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.

Authors:  R K Merton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

  1 in total
  7 in total

1.  A comment to the paper by Waltman et al., Scientometrics, 87, 467-481, 2011.

Authors:  Tobias Opthof; Loet Leydesdorff
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.238

2.  The Academic Manifesto: From an Occupied to a Public University.

Authors:  Willem Halffman; Hans Radder
Journal:  Minerva       Date:  2015

3.  Bibliometric Indicators of Russian Journals by JCR-Science Edition, 1995-2010.

Authors:  A N Libkind; V A Markusova; L E Mindeli
Journal:  Acta Naturae       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.845

4.  Employing the Gini coefficient to measure participation inequality in treatment-focused Digital Health Social Networks.

Authors:  Trevor van Mierlo; Douglas Hyatt; Andrew T Ching
Journal:  Netw Model Anal Health Inform Bioinform       Date:  2016-10-27

5.  Promoting Virtue or Punishing Fraud: Mapping Contrasts in the Language of 'Scientific Integrity'.

Authors:  S P J M Horbach; W Halffman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  The Scientific Impact Derived From the Disciplinary Profiles.

Authors:  Jüri Allik; Kalmer Lauk; Anu Realo
Journal:  Front Res Metr Anal       Date:  2020-10-16

7.  How Does National Scientific Funding Support Emerging Interdisciplinary Research: A Comparison Study of Big Data Research in the US and China.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Yi Zhang; Jan Youtie; Alan L Porter; Xuefeng Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.