Literature DB >> 20400639

Aversiveness of sounds in phocid seals: psycho-physiological factors, learning processes and motivation.

Thomas Götz1, Vincent M Janik.   

Abstract

Aversiveness of sounds and its underlying physiological mechanisms in mammals are poorly understood. In this study we tested the influence of psychophysical parameters, motivation and learning processes on the aversiveness of anthropogenic underwater noise in phocid seals (Halichoerus grypus and Phoca vitulina). We compared behavioural responses of seals to playbacks of sounds based on a model of sensory unpleasantness for humans, sounds from acoustic deterrent devices and sounds with assumed neutral properties in different contexts of food motivation. In a captive experiment with food presentation, seals habituated quickly to all sound types presented at normalised received levels of 146 dB re. 1 microPa (r.m.s., root mean square). However, the fast habituation of avoidance behaviour was also accompanied by a weak sensitisation process affecting dive times and place preference in the pool. Experiments in the wild testing animals without food presentation revealed differential responses of seals to different sound types. We observed avoidance behaviour at received levels of 135-144 dB re. 1 microPa (sensation levels of 59-79 dB). In this experiment, sounds maximised for 'roughness' perceived as unpleasant by humans also caused the strongest avoidance responses in seals, suggesting that sensory pleasantness may be the result of auditory processing that is not restricted to humans. Our results highlight the importance of considering the effects of acoustic parameters other than the received level as well as animal motivation and previous experience when assessing the impacts of anthropogenic noise on animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20400639     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.035535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  9 in total

1.  Repeated elicitation of the acoustic startle reflex leads to sensitisation in subsequent avoidance behaviour and induces fear conditioning.

Authors:  Thomas Götz; Vincent M Janik
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.288

2.  Grey seals use anthropogenic signals from acoustic tags to locate fish: evidence from a simulated foraging task.

Authors:  Amanda L Stansbury; Thomas Götz; Volker B Deecke; Vincent M Janik
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Avoidance of wind farms by harbour seals is limited to pile driving activities.

Authors:  Debbie J F Russell; Gordon D Hastie; David Thompson; Vincent M Janik; Philip S Hammond; Lindesay A S Scott-Hayward; Jason Matthiopoulos; Esther L Jones; Bernie J McConnell
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 6.528

4.  Simulated seal scarer sounds scare porpoises, but not seals: species-specific responses to 12 kHz deterrence sounds.

Authors:  Lonnie Mikkelsen; Line Hermannsen; Kristian Beedholm; Peter Teglberg Madsen; Jakob Tougaard
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Using drones and sirens to elicit avoidance behaviour in white rhinoceros as an anti-poaching tactic.

Authors:  Samuel G Penny; Rachel L White; Dawn M Scott; Lynne MacTavish; Angelo P Pernetta
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Roughness perception: A multisensory/crossmodal perspective.

Authors:  Nicola Di Stefano; Charles Spence
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.157

7.  Heart rate and startle responses in diving, captive harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) exposed to transient noise and sonar.

Authors:  Siri L Elmegaard; Birgitte I McDonald; Jonas Teilmann; Peter T Madsen
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.422

8.  Repeated exposure reduces the response to impulsive noise in European seabass.

Authors:  Andrew N Radford; Laurie Lèbre; Gilles Lecaillon; Sophie L Nedelec; Stephen D Simpson
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 10.863

9.  Pontoon trap for salmon and trout equipped with a seal exclusion device catches larger salmons.

Authors:  Linda Calamnius; Mikael Lundin; Arne Fjälling; Sara Königson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.