Literature DB >> 20400266

Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale was responsive and showed reasonable interpretability after a multidisciplinary treatment.

Christophe Demoulin1, Raymond Ostelo, J André Knottnerus, Rob J E M Smeets.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate responsiveness and interpretability of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale was administered twice (pretreatment: T1; and posttreatment: T2) to 212 patients with chronic low back pain. Analyses were based on the general perceived effect scale score and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale score changes between T1 and T2.
RESULTS: The smallest detectable change reached 15.8 points, whereas the optimal cutoff value was found to be 5 points, with area under the curve=0.850 (95% confidence interval: 0.786-0.914), sensitivity=78%, and specificity=77%. A complementary analysis of the receiver operating characteristics based on the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale score change expressed in percentage revealed an optimal cutoff point of 18.1% (area under the curve=0.856, sensitivity=72%, and specificity=85%). Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale baseline scores and the way they are used to cluster patients influenced the optimal cutoff point.
CONCLUSIONS: This study proposes values for responsiveness and interpretability indicators for patients with chronic low back pain referred for multidisciplinary treatment. The baseline score and the way to cluster patients with regard to this score have to be taken into account while interpreting the score change after treatment.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20400266     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  4 in total

1.  Assessing the amount of change in an outcome measure is not the same as assessing the importance of change.

Authors:  Paul W Stratford; Daniel L Riddle
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Validation of the work ability index-single item and the pain disability index-work item in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Imke Boekel; Alisa L Dutmer; Henrica R Schiphorst Preuper; Michiel F Reneman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Lumbar disc screening using back pain questionnaires: oswestry low back pain score, aberdeen low back pain scale, and acute low back pain screening questionnaire.

Authors:  Do Yeon Kim; Chang Hyun Oh; Seung Hwan Yoon; Hyung Chun Park; Chong Oon Park
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2012-09-30

4.  The NIH Minimal Dataset for Chronic Low Back Pain: Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Change.

Authors:  Alisa L Dutmer; Michiel F Reneman; Henrica R Schiphorst Preuper; André P Wolff; Bert L Speijer; Remko Soer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.