BACKGROUND: Due to the emergence of community-associated strains, the prevalence of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections has increased substantially in pediatric patients. A vancomycin AUC(0-24)/MIC index >400 best predicts treatment outcomes for invasive MRSA infection in adults. Data on whether recommended vancomycin doses in children achieve this break point are lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the likelihood that currently recommended vancomycin doses in children achieve AUC(0-24)/MIC >400. METHODS: Vancomycin AUC(0-24)/MIC predictions were conducted across a range of dosages (40-70 mg/kg/d) using a Monte Carlo simulation (n = 5000). AUC(0-24) was calculated as daily dose divided by vancomycin clearance, and daily dose was fixed for a given simulation. Three literature-reported estimates in children were used to define vancomycin clearance and its variance. For the MIC distribution of MRSA isolates, susceptibility data were obtained from the University of California, San Francisco Children's Hospital, San Francisco, California (n = 180; 40% < or =0.5 mg/L; 59% = 1 mg/L; and 1% = 2 mg/L). RESULTS: Using the recommended empiric dosage of 40 mg/kg/d, 58% to 66% of children were predicted to achieve AUC(0-24)/MIC >400. Increasing the vancomycin dosage to 60 mg/kg/d substantially increased the likelihood (88%-98%) of achieving this pharmacodynamic target. On sensitivity analysis, a dosage of 40 mg/kg/d was more strongly influenced by small changes in MIC compared with 60 mg/kg/d. CONCLUSIONS: Recommended empiric vancomycin dosing in children (40 mg/kg/d) was not predicted to consistently achieve the pharmacodynamic target of AUC(0-24)/MIC >400 for invasive MRSA infections. A vancomycin dosage of 60 mg/kg/d was predicted to optimize achievement of this target in children. Copyright 2010 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Due to the emergence of community-associated strains, the prevalence of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections has increased substantially in pediatric patients. A vancomycin AUC(0-24)/MIC index >400 best predicts treatment outcomes for invasive MRSA infection in adults. Data on whether recommended vancomycin doses in children achieve this break point are lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the likelihood that currently recommended vancomycin doses in children achieve AUC(0-24)/MIC >400. METHODS:Vancomycin AUC(0-24)/MIC predictions were conducted across a range of dosages (40-70 mg/kg/d) using a Monte Carlo simulation (n = 5000). AUC(0-24) was calculated as daily dose divided by vancomycin clearance, and daily dose was fixed for a given simulation. Three literature-reported estimates in children were used to define vancomycin clearance and its variance. For the MIC distribution of MRSA isolates, susceptibility data were obtained from the University of California, San Francisco Children's Hospital, San Francisco, California (n = 180; 40% < or =0.5 mg/L; 59% = 1 mg/L; and 1% = 2 mg/L). RESULTS: Using the recommended empiric dosage of 40 mg/kg/d, 58% to 66% of children were predicted to achieve AUC(0-24)/MIC >400. Increasing the vancomycin dosage to 60 mg/kg/d substantially increased the likelihood (88%-98%) of achieving this pharmacodynamic target. On sensitivity analysis, a dosage of 40 mg/kg/d was more strongly influenced by small changes in MIC compared with 60 mg/kg/d. CONCLUSIONS: Recommended empiric vancomycin dosing in children (40 mg/kg/d) was not predicted to consistently achieve the pharmacodynamic target of AUC(0-24)/MIC >400 for invasive MRSA infections. A vancomycin dosage of 60 mg/kg/d was predicted to optimize achievement of this target in children. Copyright 2010 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: George Sakoulas; George M Eliopoulos; Robert C Moellering; Richard P Novick; Lata Venkataraman; Christine Wennersten; Paola C DeGirolami; Mitchell J Schwaber; Howard S Gold Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2003-03-06 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: George Sakoulas; Pamela A Moise-Broder; Jerome Schentag; Alan Forrest; Robert C Moellering; George M Eliopoulos Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Thomas P Lodise; Nimish Patel; Ben M Lomaestro; Keith A Rodvold; George L Drusano Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-08-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Geisa Cristina da Silva Alves; Samuel Dutra da Silva; Virginia Paula Frade; Danielle Rodrigues; André de Oliveira Baldoni; Whocely Victor de Castro; Cristina Sanches Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Adam Frymoyer; B Joseph Guglielmo; Stephen D Wilson; Sarah B Scarpace; Leslie Z Benet; Adam L Hersh Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 4.705
Authors: Kevin J Downes; Andrea Hahn; Jason Wiles; Joshua D Courter; Alexander A Vinks Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 5.283
Authors: Adam Frymoyer; Adam L Hersh; Mohammed H El-Komy; Shabnam Gaskari; Felice Su; David R Drover; Krisa Van Meurs Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-08-18 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Jennifer Le; John S Bradley; William Murray; Gale L Romanowski; Tu T Tran; Natalie Nguyen; Susan Cho; Stephanie Natale; Ivilynn Bui; Tri M Tran; Edmund V Capparelli Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Jessica K Roberts; Chris Stockmann; Jonathan E Constance; Justin Stiers; Michael G Spigarelli; Robert M Ward; Catherine M T Sherwin Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 6.447