RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To develop and evaluate a novel algorithm for semiautomated segmentation and volumetry of pleural effusions in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) datasets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A seven-step algorithm for semiautomated segmentation of pleural effusions in MDCT datasets was developed, mainly using algorithms from the ITK image processing library. Semiautomated segmentation of pleural effusions was performed in 40 MDCT datasets of the chest (males = 22, females = 18, mean age: 56.7 +/- 19.3 years). The accuracy of the semiautomated segmentation as compared with a manual segmentation approach was quantified based on the differences of the segmented volumes, the degree of over-/undersegmentation, and the Hausdorff distance. The time needed for the semiautomated and the manual segmentation process were recorded and compared. RESULTS: The mean volume of the pleural effusions was 557.30 mL (+/- 477.27 mL) for the semiautomated and 553.19 (+/- 473.49 mL) for the manual segmentation. The difference was not statistically significant (Student t-test, P = .133). Regression analysis confirmed a strong relationship between the semiautomated algorithm and the gold standard (r(2) = 0.998). Mean overlap of the segmented areas was 79% (+/- 9.3%) over all datasets with moderate oversegmentation (22% +/- 9.3%) and undersegmentation (21% +/- 9.7%). The mean Hausdorff distance was 17.2 mm (+/- 8.35 mm). The mean duration of the semiautomated segmentation process with user interaction was 8.4 minutes (+/- 2.6 minutes) as compared to 32.9 minutes (+/- 17.4 minutes) for manual segmentation. CONCLUSION: The semiautomated algorithm for segmentation and volumetry of pleural effusions in MDCT datasets shows a high diagnostic accuracy when compared with manual segmentation. 2010 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To develop and evaluate a novel algorithm for semiautomated segmentation and volumetry of pleural effusions in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) datasets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A seven-step algorithm for semiautomated segmentation of pleural effusions in MDCT datasets was developed, mainly using algorithms from the ITK image processing library. Semiautomated segmentation of pleural effusions was performed in 40 MDCT datasets of the chest (males = 22, females = 18, mean age: 56.7 +/- 19.3 years). The accuracy of the semiautomated segmentation as compared with a manual segmentation approach was quantified based on the differences of the segmented volumes, the degree of over-/undersegmentation, and the Hausdorff distance. The time needed for the semiautomated and the manual segmentation process were recorded and compared. RESULTS: The mean volume of the pleural effusions was 557.30 mL (+/- 477.27 mL) for the semiautomated and 553.19 (+/- 473.49 mL) for the manual segmentation. The difference was not statistically significant (Student t-test, P = .133). Regression analysis confirmed a strong relationship between the semiautomated algorithm and the gold standard (r(2) = 0.998). Mean overlap of the segmented areas was 79% (+/- 9.3%) over all datasets with moderate oversegmentation (22% +/- 9.3%) and undersegmentation (21% +/- 9.7%). The mean Hausdorff distance was 17.2 mm (+/- 8.35 mm). The mean duration of the semiautomated segmentation process with user interaction was 8.4 minutes (+/- 2.6 minutes) as compared to 32.9 minutes (+/- 17.4 minutes) for manual segmentation. CONCLUSION: The semiautomated algorithm for segmentation and volumetry of pleural effusions in MDCT datasets shows a high diagnostic accuracy when compared with manual segmentation. 2010 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Branislav Veljkovic; Sabine Franckenberg; Gary M Hatch; Matthias Bucher; Nicole Schwendener; Garyfalia Ampanozi; Michael J Thali; Thomas D Ruder Journal: Emerg Radiol Date: 2013-03-16
Authors: Matthew P Moy; Jeffrey M Levsky; Netanel S Berko; Alla Godelman; Vineet R Jain; Linda B Haramati Journal: Chest Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Roberto Lo Gullo; Shelly Mishra; Diego A Lira; Atul Padole; Alexi Otrakji; Ranish Deedar Ali Khawaja; Sarvenaz Pourjabbar; Sarabjeet Singh; Jo-Anne O Shepard; Subba R Digumarthy; Mannudeep K Kalra; James R Stone Journal: Forensic Sci Med Pathol Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 2.007
Authors: Kendall J Kiser; Sara Ahmed; Sonja Stieb; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Hesham Elhalawani; Peter Y S Park; Nathan S Doyle; Brandon J Wang; Arko Barman; Zhao Li; W Jim Zheng; Clifton D Fuller; Luca Giancardo Journal: Med Phys Date: 2020-08-28 Impact factor: 4.071