Literature DB >> 20399427

Accuracy of biochemical markers for predicting nasogastric tube placement in adults--a systematic review of diagnostic studies.

Ritin S Fernandez1, Janita Pak-Chun Chau, David R Thompson, Rhonda Griffiths, Hoi-Shan Lo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of biochemical tests used to determine placement of nasogastric (NG) tubes after insertion in adults.
DESIGN: A systematic review of diagnostic studies was undertaken. DATA SOURCES: A literature search of the bibliographic databases and the World Wide Web was performed to locate original diagnostic studies in English or Chinese on biochemical markers for detecting NG tube location. REVIEW
METHODS: Studies in which one or more different tests were evaluated with a reference standard, and diagnostic values were reported or could be calculated were included. Two reviewers independently checked all abstracts and full text studies for inclusion criteria. Included studies were assessed for their quality using the QUADAS tool. Study features and diagnostic values were extracted from the included studies.
RESULTS: Of the 10 studies included in this review, seven investigated the diagnostic accuracy of pH, one investigated the diagnostic accuracy of pH and bilirubin respectively, two a combination of pH and bilirubin and one a combination of pH, pepsin and trypsin levels in identifying NG tube location. All studies used X-rays as the reference standard for comparison. Pooled results demonstrated that a pH of <or=4.0 had the ability to predict only 63% of the tubes located in the stomach. However, a pH value of <or=5.5 to determine gastric placement demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.89 (95% CI 0.82-0.94) and a specificity of 0.87 (95% CI 0.81-0.93). Bilirubin coupled with pH had a high specificity (0.99) which demonstrated the ability of the test to identify misplaced tubes in intestine. However, the ability of the test to correctly identify gastric placement of feeding tubes was relatively low (sensitivity<0.90).
CONCLUSIONS: Due to the heterogeneity of the studies and small sample sizes, conclusions about the diagnostic performance of the different tests cannot be drawn. Better designed studies exploring the accuracy of diagnostic tests are needed to improve the diagnostic policy. Until stronger evidence becomes available practice related to the diagnostic tests used within the clinical setting will continue to be dictated by local preferences and cost factors. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20399427     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  5 in total

1.  Nasogastric tube in mechanical ventilated patients: ETCO2 and pH measuring to confirm correct placement. A pilot study.

Authors:  Samuele Ceruti; Simone Dell'Era; Francesco Ruggiero; Giovanni Bona; Andrea Glotta; Maira Biggiogero; Edoardo Tasciotti; Christoph Kronenberg; Gianluca Lollo; Andrea Saporito
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Intraoperative Gastric Tube Intubation: A Summary of Case Studies and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Michael Long; Melissa Machan; Luis Tollinche
Journal:  Open J Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-03

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of a pH stick, modified to detect gastric lipase, to confirm the correct placement of nasogastric tubes.

Authors:  Anne M Rowat; Catriona Graham; Martin Dennis
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-07-31

4.  Study to determine the likely accuracy of pH testing to confirm nasogastric tube placement.

Authors:  Anne M Rowat; Catriona Graham; Martin Dennis
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-06-09

Review 5.  Nasogastric Tube Feeding in Older Patients: A Review of Current Practice and Challenges Faced.

Authors:  Devkishan Chauhan; Surabhi Varma; Melanie Dani; Michael B Fertleman; Louis J Koizia
Journal:  Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res       Date:  2021-01-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.