Literature DB >> 20399223

Objective depth-of-focus is different from subjective depth-of-focus and correlated with accommodative microfluctuations.

Peijun Yao1, Huiling Lin, Jia Huang, Renyuan Chu, Bai-Chuan Jiang.   

Abstract

In this study, we investigated whether the objective depth-of-focus (DOF) is different from the subjective DOF and whether it correlates to accommodative microfluctuations (AMF). The objective DOF and subjective DOF at 1.5 D accommodative stimulus (AS) level were compared in the same group of subjects. The objective DOF and magnitude of AMF were measured at 5 AS levels from 0 D to 4 D. Results showed that there was a significant difference and no correlation between the objective DOF and the subjective DOF. The objective DOF was correlated to the magnitude of AMF. The results suggest that objective DOF and subjective DOF represent the blur sensitivity of two different systems. AMF are correlated with the blur sensitivity of the accommodative system. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20399223     DOI： 10.1016/j.visres.2010.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN： 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  Blur Detection, Depth of Field, and Accommodation in Emmetropic and Hyperopic Children.

Authors:  Tawna L Roberts; Scott B Stevenson; Julia S Benoit; Ruth E Manny; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  The clinical depth of field achievable with trifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses: theoretical considerations and proof of concept clinical results.

Authors:  Ante Barišić; Sudi Patel; Nikica Gabric; Claes G Feinbaum
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Validation of the PowerRef 3 for Measuring Accommodation: Comparison With the Grand Seiko WAM-5500A Autorefractor.

Authors:  Alyssa M Gehring; Jennifer X Haensel; Molly K Curtiss; Tawna L Roberts
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.048

4.  Depth-of-field of the accommodating eye.

Authors:  Paula Bernal-Molina; Robert Montés-Micó; Richard Legras; Norberto López-Gil
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Sensitivity of Chaos Measures in Detecting Stress in the Focusing Control Mechanism of the Short-Sighted Eye.

Authors:  Karen M Hampson; Matthew P Cufflin; Edward A H Mallen
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 1.758

6.  Cognitive Demand and Accommodative Microfluctuations.

Authors:  Niall J Hynes; Matthew P Cufflin; Karen M Hampson; Edward A H Mallen
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-06

7.  The effect of refractive surgery on blur thresholds.

Authors:  Rachapalle Reddi Sudhir; Hadiya Farhath Pattan; Mehal Rathore; Mohana Kuppuswamy Parthasarathy; Prema Padmanabhan; Vasudevan Lakshminarayanan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

8.  Correction of Low-Moderate Hyperopia Improves Accommodative Function for Some Hyperopic Children During Sustained Near Work.

Authors:  Michael Ntodie; Kathryn J Saunders; Julie-Anne Little
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Seeing the future: Predictive control in neural models of ocular accommodation.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Christos Kaspiris-Rousellis; Toby S Wood; Bing Wu; Björn N S Vlaskamp; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.004
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.