Literature DB >> 20398897

Repeated checking causes distrust in memory but not in attention and perception.

Eliane C P Dek1, Marcel A van den Hout, Catharina L Giele, Iris M Engelhard.   

Abstract

Repeated checking to reduce memory distrust seems to be counterproductive: it increases memory distrust. Obsessive-compulsive (OC) patients tend to be uncertain about other cognitive domains as well, like attention and perception. In an experiment with 70 healthy participants, we tested whether perseverative checking induces distrust not only in memory, but also in attention and perception. Participants were administered a computer task in which they had to activate, deactivate, and check threat-irrelevant stimuli, and rate their confidence in memory, attention, and perception in a pre-test and post-test. In between these tests, the relevant checking group performed 20 checks of the same stimuli used in the pre- and post-test. The irrelevant checking group performed 20 checks of different stimuli. Although memory accuracy improved in both groups, repeated checking reduced confidence in memory, vividness, and detail in the relevant checking group, but not in the irrelevant checking group. A trend was found towards a decline in attentional confidence in the relevant checking group only. Perception was not affected by repetitive checking. A replication study revealed similar results of relevant checking on meta-memory, however, the trend for attentional distrust was not confirmed. The results suggest that perseveration may be domain specific, i.e., only the cognitive processes that are subject to perseveration are affected. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20398897     DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Ther        ISSN: 0005-7967


  2 in total

1.  Taxing Working Memory during Retrieval of Emotional Memories Does Not Reduce Memory Accessibility When Cued with Reminders.

Authors:  Kevin van Schie; Iris M Engelhard; Marcel A van den Hout
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 4.157

2.  What checkers actually check: an eye tracking study of inhibitory control and working memory.

Authors:  Ben Harkin; Sebastien Miellet; Klaus Kessler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.