Literature DB >> 20398881

The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.

Sarah Lukas1, Andrea M Philipp, Iring Koch.   

Abstract

The present study examined the effects of cue-based preparation and cue-target modality mapping in crossmodal task switching. In two experiments, we randomly presented lateralized visual and auditory stimuli simultaneously. Subjects were asked to make a left/right judgment for a stimulus in only one of the modalities. Prior to each trial, the relevant stimulus modality was indicated by a visual or auditory cue. The cueing interval was manipulated to examine preparation. In Experiment 1, we used a corresponding mapping of cue-modality and stimulus modality, whereas in Experiment 2 the mapping of cue and stimulus modalities was reversed. We found reduced modality-switch costs with a long cueing interval, showing that attention shifts to stimulus modalities can be prepared, irrespective of cue-target modality mapping. We conclude that perceptual processing in crossmodal switching can be biased in a preparatory way towards task-relevant stimulus modalities. 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20398881     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  9 in total

1.  Are there control processes, and (if so) can they be studied?

Authors:  Glenn R Wylie; James F Sumowski; Micah Murray
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-29

2.  Efficiency of lexical access in children with autism spectrum disorders: does modality matter?

Authors:  Keely Harper-Hill; David Copland; Wendy Arnott
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2014-08

3.  Exploring Modality Compatibility in the Response-Effect Compatibility Paradigm.

Authors:  Noémi Földes; Andrea M Philipp; Arnaud Badets; Iring Koch
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-03-31

4.  The variability of multisensory processes of natural stimuli in human and non-human primates in a detection task.

Authors:  Cécile Juan; Céline Cappe; Baptiste Alric; Benoit Roby; Sophie Gilardeau; Pascal Barone; Pascal Girard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Neural activity patterns between different executive tasks are more similar in adulthood than in adolescence.

Authors:  Mona Moisala; Viljami Salmela; Synnove Carlson; Katariina Salmela-Aro; Kirsti Lonka; Kai Hakkarainen; Kimmo Alho
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  Contextual Features of the Cue Enter Episodic Bindings in Task Switching.

Authors:  Elena Benini; Iring Koch; Susanne Mayr; Christian Frings; Andrea M Philipp
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2022-04-18

7.  Are some effector systems harder to switch to? In search of cost asymmetries when switching between manual, vocal, and oculomotor tasks.

Authors:  Mareike A Hoffmann; Iring Koch; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-02-23

8.  Visual Dominance Effect upon Passing the Central Bottleneck of Information Processing.

Authors:  Xing-Qi Yao; Yu-Qian Yang; Shi-Yong Chen; Wei Sun; Qi Chen
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  Processing time not modality dominates shift costs in the modality-shifting effect.

Authors:  Hettie Roebuck; Kun Guo; Patrick Bourke
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-12-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.