Literature DB >> 20398446

Should PCNL patients have a CT in the prone position preoperatively?

Venu Chalasani1, Darren Bissoon, Ashok K Bhuvanagir, Adrian Mizzi, Ian B Dunn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Lower pole percutaneous nephrostomy is performed frequently for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), using a variety of imaging modalities such as fluoroscopic, computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound guidance. This study was performed to estimate the potential risk of colonic injury during lower pole percutaneous nephrostomy for PCNL.
METHODS: We observed the position of the colon relative to the kidney in 134 patients who underwent CT kidney, ureter, bladder (KUB) examinations in the prone position.
RESULTS: We found the prevalence of colon lying posterior to the kidney (i.e. retrorenal) in males to be 13.6% on the right, and 11.9% on the left, whilst in females it was 13.4% on the right and 26.2% on the left.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients at higher risk for retrorenal colon should be considered for preoperative imaging to identify those patients in whom the colon may be situated posterior to the kidney, allowing for appropriate alterations in technique to be made, such as the use of ultrasound or CT guidance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20398446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Urol        ISSN: 1195-9479            Impact factor:   1.344


  9 in total

1.  Colon perforation during percutaneous renal surgery: a 10-year experience in a single endourology centre.

Authors:  Stefanos Kachrilas; Kachrilas Stefanos; Athanasios Papatsoris; Papatsoris Athanasios; Christian Bach; Bach Christian; Stylianos Kontos; Kontos Stylianos; Zaman Faruquz; Faruquz Zaman; Anuj Goyal; Goyal Anuj; Junaid Masood; Masood Junaid; Noor Buchholz; Buchholz Noor
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-02-04

2.  An unusual presentation of colon perforation following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Barbara Chubak; Joshua M Stern
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Retro-renal colon: role in percutaneous access.

Authors:  Govind Sharma; Dharmendra Kumar Jangid; S S Yadav; Rajeev Mathur; Vinay Tomar
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: complications and how to deal with them.

Authors:  Daniel A Wollin; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Multislice computed tomography vs. intravenous urography for planning supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Osama A El-Wahab; Magdy A El-Tabey; Ehab El-Barky; Shabieb A El-Baky; Adel El-Falah; Medhat Refaat
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2013-12-18

Review 6.  What's new in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Arvind P Ganpule; Mahesh R Desai
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-08-14

7.  The ideal puncture approach for PCNL: Fluoroscopy, ultrasound or endoscopy?

Authors:  Bannakij Lojanapiwat
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-07

8.  Unenhanced low-dose versus standard-dose CT localization in patients with upper urinary calculi for minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL).

Authors:  Jiang Licheng; Fan Yidong; Wang Ping; Yan Keqiang; Wang Xueting; Zhang Yingchen; Gao Lei; Ding Jiyang; Xu Zhonghua
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Advantages and limitations.

Authors:  Foo Cheong Ng; Wai Loon Yam; Tze Ying Benjamin Lim; Jin Kiat Teo; Kok Kit Ng; Sey Kiat Lim
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-08-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.