| Literature DB >> 20398182 |
F H A Osier1, L M Murungi, G Fegan, J Tuju, K K Tetteh, P C Bull, D J Conway, K Marsh.
Abstract
IgG and IgG3 antibodies to merozoite surface protein-2 (MSP-2) of Plasmodium falciparum have been associated with protection from clinical malaria in independent studies. We determined whether this protection was allele-specific by testing whether children who developed clinical malaria lacked IgG/IgG3 antibodies specific to the dominant msp2 parasite genotypes detected during clinical episodes. We analysed pre-existing IgG and IgG1/IgG3 antibodies to antigens representing the major dimorphic types of MSP-2 by ELISA. We used quantitative real-time PCR to determine the dominant msp2 alleles in parasites detected in clinical episodes. Over half (55%, 80/146) of infections contained both allelic types. Single or dominant IC1- and FC27-like alleles were detected in 46% and 42% of infections respectively, and both types were equally dominant in 12%. High levels of IgG/IgG3 antibodies to the FC27-like antigen were not significantly associated with a lower likelihood of clinical episodes caused by parasites bearing FC27-like compared to IC1-like alleles, and vice versa for IgG/IgG3 antibodies to the IC1-like antigen. These findings were supported by competition ELISAs which demonstrated the presence of IgG antibodies to allele-specific epitopes within both antigens. Thus, even for this well-studied antigen, the importance of an allele-specific component of naturally acquired protective immunity to malaria remains to be confirmed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20398182 PMCID: PMC2847195 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2009.01178.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasite Immunol ISSN: 0141-9838 Impact factor: 2.280
Figure 1Genomic DNA extracted from laboratory cultures containing known mixtures of parasites bearing type A or type B msp2 alleles was assayed by QRT-PCR using primers for type A and type B alleles. Left panel: as the proportion of type A bearing parasites decreased, the Ct increased proportionally. Right panel: as the proportion of type B bearing parasites increased, the Ct decreased proportionally. Error bars indicate the standard deviations for four independent runs.
Number of isolates containing each of the major msp2 alleles
| Type B | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Type A | 0 | 1 | Total |
| 0 | 1 | 25 | 26 |
| 1 | 40 | 80 | 120 |
| Total | 41 | 105 | 146 |
Figure 2Correlation between IgG antibody reactivity to MSP-2 type A and B antigens. Dashed lines indicate cut-off values for sero-positivity, while solid lines indicate cut-off values for high levels of antibodies. Pairwise correlation coefficient was 0·67, P < 0·001 (n = 146).
Logistic regression for the effect of type A (or B) MSP-2 IgG antibodies on clinical episodes caused by parasites bearinghomologous vs. heterologous alleles
| Single allele infections | Single and dominant allele infections | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antibodies | Odds ratio 95% CI | Odds ratio 95% CI | ||
| Sero-positive A | 0·84 (0·30–2·37) | 0·747 | 1·07 (0·52–2·23) | 0·837 |
| High level A | 2·88 (0·55–14·81) | 0·207 | 1·96 (0·80–4·81) | 0·140 |
| Sero-positive B | 0·76 (0·27–2·11) | 0·603 | 1·20 (0·58–2·48) | 0·608 |
| High level B | 0·44 (0·12–1·57) | 0·209 | 0·53 (0·23–1·21) | 0·134 |
For type A IgG antibodies, the odds ratios indicate the protective effects of sero-positivity for (or high levels of) type A IgG antibodies on clinical episodes with parasites bearing type A as opposed to B alleles. Similarly, for type B IgG antibodies, the odds ratios indicate the protective effects of sero-positivity for (or high levels of) type B IgG antibodies on clinical episodes with parasites bearing type B as opposed to A alleles. Single allele infections, n = 65 (40 type A and 25 type B alleles, respectively). Single and dominant clone infections, n = 128 (67 type A and 61 type B alleles, respectively).
Prevalence of sero-positivity or high level IgG antibodies for MSP-2 antigens amongst children with a single or dominant msp2 major allelic type
| MSP-2 antibodies | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sero-positive A | Sero-negative A | Sero-positive B | Sero-negative B | |
| Single type A alleles ( | 24 (60) | 16 (40) | 25 (62·5) | 15 (37·5) |
| Single type B alleles ( | 16 (64) | 9 (36) | 14 (56) | 11 (44) |
| Dominant type A alleles ( | 44 (66) | 23 (34) | 41 (61) | 26 (39) |
| Dominant type B alleles ( | 39 (64) | 22 (36) | 40 (66) | 21 (34) |
| High level A | Low level A | High level B | Low level B | |
| Single type A alleles ( | 8 (20) | 32 (80) | 12 (30) | 28 (70) |
| Single type B alleles ( | 4 (16) | 21 (84) | 2 (8) | 23 (92) |
| Dominant type A alleles ( | 17 (25) | 50 (75) | 21 (31) | 46 (69) |
| Dominant type B alleles ( | 9 (15) | 52 (85) | 12 (20) | 49 (80) |
Similar proportions of children with single or single plus dominant allele type A or B infections were sero-positive for pre-existing type A and type B IgG antibodies, respectively. Children infected with type A or B alleles had low levels of IgG antibodies to the homologous antigen, but also had similarly low levels of IgG antibodies to the heterologous antigen, indicating that the lack of protection was not allele-specific.