Literature DB >> 20397736

Development safety update reports and proposals for effective and efficient risk communication.

Hisashi Urushihara1, Koji Kawakami.   

Abstract

The periodic safety reporting to regulatory authorities is globally harmonized for postmarketing medicinal products by the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines, and is being extended for investigational drugs. To facilitate effective safety risk communication regarding investigational drugs, and to reduce duplicate periodic reporting to the US and EU by sponsors during development programmes, standardized Development Safety Update Reports (DSURs) are to be implemented in the near future. In this current opinion article, after extensively reviewing the relevant report from the CIOMS VII Working Group and the ICH draft guideline regarding DSURs, we discuss an effective and efficient approach to its application. To ensure effective risk communication, we recommend that DSURs be made available to all the ethics committees and participating investigators around the world for the purpose of continuing review during ongoing clinical trials. Furthermore, in order to maintain the consistency and integrity of safety information throughout the life-cycle of a drug, we believe it would be substantially more prudent and efficient to start a single, integrated, life-cycle periodic safety report covering both development and postmarketing, as proposed by the CIOMS VII Working Group, rather than maintain separate DSURs and Periodic Safety Update Reports, which can overlap considerably in content. To this end, we believe that the international regulatory community should undertake the new initiative for integrated periodic reporting immediately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20397736     DOI: 10.2165/11533780-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  2 in total

1.  Meta-analysis and epidemiologic studies in drug development and postmarketing surveillance.

Authors:  R Temple
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-03-03       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Pharmacovigilance during the pre-approval phases: an evolving pharmaceutical industry model in response to ICH E2E, CIOMS VI, FDA and EMEA/CHMP risk-management guidelines.

Authors:  Craig G Hartford; Kasia S Petchel; Hani Mickail; Susana Perez-Gutthann; Mary McHale; John M Grana; Paula Marquez
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Using resources for scientific-driven pharmacovigilance: from many product safety documents to one product safety master file.

Authors:  Giovanni Furlan
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Pharmacoepidemiology in Japan: medical databases and research achievements.

Authors:  Shiro Tanaka; Kahori Seto; Koji Kawakami
Journal:  J Pharm Health Care Sci       Date:  2015-05-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.