Literature DB >> 20397600

Blast mines: physics, injury mechanisms and vehicle protection.

A Ramasamy1, A M Hill, A E Hepper, A M J Bull, J C Clasper.   

Abstract

Since World War II, more vehicles have been lost to land mines than all other threats combined. Anti-vehicular (AV) mines are capable of disabling a heavy vehicle, or completely destroying a lighter vehicle. The most common form of AV mine is the blast mine, which uses a large amount of explosive to directly damage the target. In a conventional military setting, landmines are used as a defensive force-multiplier and to restrict the movements of the opposing force. They are relatively cheap to purchase and easy to acquire, hence landmines are also potent weapons in the insurgents' armamentarium. The stand-offnature of its design has allowed insurgents to cause significant injuries to security forces in current conflicts with little personal risk. As a result, AV mines and improvised explosive devices (IEDs) have become the most common cause of death and injury to Coalition and local security forces operating in Iraq and Afghanistan. Detonation of an AV mine causes an explosive, exothermic reaction which results in the formation of a shockwave followed by a rapid expansion of gases. The shockwave is mainly reflected by the soillair interface and fractures the soil cap overthe mine. The detonation products then vent through the voids in the soil, resulting in a hollow inverse cone which consists of the detonation gases surrounded by the soil ejecta. It is the combination of the detonation products and soil ejecta that interact with the target vehicle and cause injury to the vehicle occupants. A number of different strategies are required to mitigate the blast effects of an explosion. Primary blast effects can be reduced by increasing the standoff distance between the seat of the explosion and the crew compartment. Enhancement of armour on the base of the vehicle, as well as improvements in personal protection can prevent penetration of fragments. Mitigating tertiary effects can be achieved by altering the vehicle geometry and structure, increasing vehicle mass, as well as developing new strategies to reduce the transfer of the impulse through the vehicle to the occupants. Protection from thermal injury can be provided by incorporating fire resistant materials into the vehicle and in personal clothing. The challenge for the vehicle designer is the incorporation of these protective measures within an operationally effective platform.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20397600     DOI: 10.1136/jramc-155-04-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Army Med Corps        ISSN: 0035-8665            Impact factor:   1.285


  9 in total

Review 1.  In-vehicle extremity injuries from improvised explosive devices: current and future foci.

Authors:  Arul Ramasamy; Spyros D Masouros; Nicolas Newell; Adam M Hill; William G Proud; Katherine A Brown; Anthony M J Bull; Jon C Clasper
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Battlefield radiology.

Authors:  R N J Graham
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Blast-related fracture patterns: a forensic biomechanical approach.

Authors:  Arul Ramasamy; Adam M Hill; Spyros Masouros; Iain Gibb; Anthony M J Bull; Jon C Clasper
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Modeling the Long-Term Consequences of Repeated Blast-Induced Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries.

Authors:  Denes V Agoston
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Primary blast-induced traumatic brain injury in rats leads to increased prion protein in plasma: a potential biomarker for blast-induced traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Nam Pham; Thomas W Sawyer; Yushan Wang; Ferdous Rastgar Jazii; Cory Vair; Changiz Taghibiglou
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Serum-based protein biomarkers in blast-induced traumatic brain injury spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Denes V Agoston; Mohammad Elsayed
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 7.  Blast Injury in the Spine: Dynamic Response Index Is Not an Appropriate Model for Predicting Injury.

Authors:  Edward Spurrier; James A G Singleton; Spyros Masouros; Iain Gibb; Jon Clasper
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Preliminary Considerations for Crime Scene Analysis in Cases of Animals Affected by Homemade Ammonium Nitrate and Aluminum Powder Anti-Personnel Landmines in Colombia: Characteristics and Effects.

Authors:  Carlos Jaramillo Gutiérrez; Gustavo Farías Roldán; Krešimir Severin; Ubicelio Martin Orozco; Pilar Marín García; Víctor Toledo González
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.231

9.  The Injury Mechanism of Traumatic Amputation.

Authors:  Iain A Rankin; Thuy-Tien Nguyen; Louise McMenemy; Jonathan C Clasper; Spyros D Masouros
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-04-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.