AIM: To examine the coexistence of metachronous and synchronous cancer in branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas (IPMN). METHODS: We reviewed the records of 145 patients with branch duct IPMN between January 1991 and April 2008 and assessed the relationship between IPMN and intra- or extra-pancreatic carcinoma and the outcome of IPMN. RESULTS: The mean observation period was 55.9 +/- 45.3 mo. Among the 145 patients, the frequency of extra-pancreatic cancer was 29.0%. The frequency of gastric cancer, colon cancer, breast cancer, and pancreatic cancer were 25.5%, 15.7%, 13.7%, and 9.8%, respectively. Twenty (13.8%) of the patients died. The cause of death was extra-pancreatic carcinoma in 40%, pancreatic cancer in 25%, IPMN per se in 20%, and benign disease in 15% of the patients. CONCLUSION: The prognosis for IPMN depends not on the IPMN per se, but on the presence of intra- or extra-pancreatic cancer.
AIM: To examine the coexistence of metachronous and synchronous cancer in branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas (IPMN). METHODS: We reviewed the records of 145 patients with branch duct IPMN between January 1991 and April 2008 and assessed the relationship between IPMN and intra- or extra-pancreatic carcinoma and the outcome of IPMN. RESULTS: The mean observation period was 55.9 +/- 45.3 mo. Among the 145 patients, the frequency of extra-pancreatic cancer was 29.0%. The frequency of gastric cancer, colon cancer, breast cancer, and pancreatic cancer were 25.5%, 15.7%, 13.7%, and 9.8%, respectively. Twenty (13.8%) of the patients died. The cause of death was extra-pancreatic carcinoma in 40%, pancreatic cancer in 25%, IPMN per se in 20%, and benign disease in 15% of the patients. CONCLUSION: The prognosis for IPMN depends not on the IPMN per se, but on the presence of intra- or extra-pancreatic cancer.
Entities:
Keywords:
Extra-pancreatic cancer; Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas; Long-term follow-up; Pancreatic cancer; Prognosis
Authors: K Yamao; K Ohashi; T Nakamura; T Suzuki; Y Shimizu; Y Nakamura; Y Horibe; A Yanagisawa; A Nakao; Y Nimuara; Y Naito; T Hayakawa Journal: Hepatogastroenterology Date: 2000 Jul-Aug
Authors: Suresh T Chari; Dhiraj Yadav; Thomas C Smyrk; Eugene P DiMagno; Laurence J Miller; Massimo Raimondo; Jonathan E Clain; Ian A Norton; Randall K Pearson; Bret T Petersen; Maurits J Wiersema; Michael B Farnell; Michael G Sarr Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Roberto Salvia; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo; Claudio Bassi; Sarah P Thayer; Massimo Falconi; William Mantovani; Paolo Pederzoli; Andrew L Warshaw Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Yuichi Kitagawa; Trisha A Unger; Shari Taylor; Richard A Kozarek; L William Traverso Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Gian Luca Baiocchi; Sarah Molfino; Barbara Frittoli; Graziella Pigozzi; Federico Gheza; Giacomo Gaverini; Antonio Tarasconi; Chiara Ricci; Francesco Bertagna; Luigi Grazioli; Guido A M Tiberio; Nazario Portolani Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-06-21 Impact factor: 5.742