BACKGROUND: Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may vary by geographical region and racial background. No data exists for this test in the Middle Eastern population. In addition, there is limited data on the impact of virological status on AFP levels. METHODS: In a multicenter, case-control study involving 206 cases, 199 cirrhotic and 197 chronic hepatitis controls, we assessed the utility of AFP in the diagnosis of HCC (sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, and positive likelihood ratios (LR). PPV and NPV were evaluated for three additional HCC prevalence rates (5, 10, and 20%). RESULTS: The best discriminating AFP value was 11.7 ng/ml. The sensitivity ranged from 32 to 79.5% at different AFP levels with the specificity increasing sequentially from 47.7 to 98.5%. Sensitivity of AFP at the best cut-off level for hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and non-viral etiology for HCC was 73.7, 65.6, and 59.5%, respectively. Specificity at this level for HCV, HBV, and non-viral etiology was 36.6, 30.1, and 29.4%, respectively. AFP cut-off levels of 102, 200, and 400 ng/ml showed similar sensitivity (39.8, 35.9, and 32%, respectively) and specificity (96, 98.5, and 98.5% respectively). Positive LR for AFP at >11.7, >20, >102, >200, >400 ng/ml were 2.8, 3.3, 9.9, 23.8, and 21.2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In cirrhotic patients, AFP has a poor screening and diagnostic value for HCC. Underlying viral etiology fails to influence the diagnostic accuracy of this test. An AFP level greater than 100 ng/ml has a high degree of specificity and may be used as a confirmatory test.
BACKGROUND:Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may vary by geographical region and racial background. No data exists for this test in the Middle Eastern population. In addition, there is limited data on the impact of virological status on AFP levels. METHODS: In a multicenter, case-control study involving 206 cases, 199 cirrhotic and 197 chronic hepatitis controls, we assessed the utility of AFP in the diagnosis of HCC (sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, and positive likelihood ratios (LR). PPV and NPV were evaluated for three additional HCC prevalence rates (5, 10, and 20%). RESULTS: The best discriminating AFP value was 11.7 ng/ml. The sensitivity ranged from 32 to 79.5% at different AFP levels with the specificity increasing sequentially from 47.7 to 98.5%. Sensitivity of AFP at the best cut-off level for hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and non-viral etiology for HCC was 73.7, 65.6, and 59.5%, respectively. Specificity at this level for HCV, HBV, and non-viral etiology was 36.6, 30.1, and 29.4%, respectively. AFP cut-off levels of 102, 200, and 400 ng/ml showed similar sensitivity (39.8, 35.9, and 32%, respectively) and specificity (96, 98.5, and 98.5% respectively). Positive LR for AFP at >11.7, >20, >102, >200, >400 ng/ml were 2.8, 3.3, 9.9, 23.8, and 21.2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In cirrhotic patients, AFP has a poor screening and diagnostic value for HCC. Underlying viral etiology fails to influence the diagnostic accuracy of this test. An AFP level greater than 100 ng/ml has a high degree of specificity and may be used as a confirmatory test.
Authors: Ayman A Abdo; Badr M Al-Jarallah; Faisal M Sanai; Ahmad S Hersi; Khalid Al-Swat; Nahla A Azzam; Manal Al-Dukhayil; Amira Al-Maarik; Faleh Z Al-Faleh Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2006-11-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: M Colombo; R de Franchis; E Del Ninno; A Sangiovanni; C De Fazio; M Tommasini; M F Donato; A Piva; V Di Carlo; N Dioguardi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1991-09-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Fabio Farinati; Dario Marino; Massimo De Giorgio; Anna Baldan; Maria Cantarini; Carmela Cursaro; Gianludovico Rapaccini; Paolo Del Poggio; Maria Anna Di Nolfo; Luisa Benvegnù; Marco Zoli; Franco Borzio; Mauro Bernardi; Franco Trevisani Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Ayman A Abdo; Huda Al Abdul Karim; Turki Al Fuhaid; Faisal M Sanai; Munthir Kabbani; Abdulrahman Al Jumah; Kelly Burak Journal: Ann Saudi Med Date: 2006 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.526
Authors: Saleh A Alqahtani; Faisal M Sanai; Ashwaq Alolayan; Faisal Abaalkhail; Hamad Alsuhaibani; Mazen Hassanain; Waleed Alhazzani; Abdullah Alsuhaibani; Abdullah Algarni; Alejandro Forner; Richard S Finn; Waleed K Al-Hamoudi Journal: Saudi J Gastroenterol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 2.485
Authors: Mashael R Al-Anazi; Sabine Matou-Nasri; Ayman A Abdo; Faisal M Sanai; Mohammed Q Khan; Ali Albenmousa; Hamad I Al-Ashgar; Nisreen Z Khalaf; Mohammed N Al-Ahdal; Ahmed A Al-Qahtani Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2014-12-31 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Cha Young Kim; Bo Ra Kim; Sang Soo Lee; Dae-Hong Jeon; Chang Min Lee; Wan Soo Kim; Hyun Chin Cho; Jin Joo Kim; Jae Min Lee; Hong Jun Kim; Chang Yoon Ha; Hyun Jin Kim; Tae Hyo Kim; Woon Tae Jung; Ok-Jae Lee Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 1.889