Literature DB >> 20395807

Does voltage predict return to work and neuropsychiatric sequelae following electrical burn injury?

Shruti Chudasama1, Jeremy Goverman, Jeffrey H Donaldson, John van Aalst, Bruce A Cairns, Charles Scott Hultman.   

Abstract

Voltage has historically guided the acute management and long-term prognosis of physical morbidity in electrical injury patients; however, few large studies exist that include neuropsychiatric morbidity in final outcome analysis. This review compares high (>1000 V) to low (<1000 V) voltage injuries, focusing on return to work and neuropsychiatric sequelae following electrical burn injury. Patients with electrical injuries admitted to the University of North Carolina Jaycee Burn Center between 2000 and 2005 were prospectively entered into a trauma database, then retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 4 cohorts: high voltage (>1000 V), low voltage (<1000 V), flash arc, and lightning. Demographics, hospital course, and follow-up were recorded to determine physical and neuropsychiatric morbidity. Differences among cohorts were tested for statistical significance. Over 5 years, 2548 patients were admitted to the burn center, including 115 patients with electrical injuries. There were 110 males and 5 females, with a mean age of 35 years (range, 0.75-65 years). The cause of the electrical injury was high voltage in 60 cases, low voltage in 25 cases, flash arc in 29 cases and lightning in 1 case. The mean total body surface area burn was 8% (range, 0%-52%). The etiology was work-related electrical injury in 85 patients. Mean follow-up period was 352 days with 13 (11%) patients lost to follow-up. Patients with high voltage injuries had significantly larger total body surface area burn, longer ICU stays, longer hospitalizations, and significantly higher rates of fasciotomy, amputation, nerve decompression and outpatient reconstruction, with 4 cases of renal failure and 2 deaths. In spite of these differences, high and low voltage groups experienced similar rates of neuropsychiatric sequelae, limited return to work and delays in return to work. Final impairment ratings for the high and low voltage groups were 17.5% and 5.3%, respectively. Electrical injuries often incur severe morbidity despite relatively small burn size and/or low voltage. When comparing high and low voltage injuries, similarities in endpoints such as neuropsychiatric sequelae, the need for late reconstruction, and failure to return to work challenge previous notions that voltage predicts outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20395807     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181c1ff31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  14 in total

Review 1.  Long-term sequelae of electrical injury.

Authors:  Marni L Wesner; John Hickie
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  Neurological and neuropsychological consequences of electrical and lightning shock: review and theories of causation.

Authors:  Christopher J Andrews; Andrew D Reisner
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.135

3.  Electrical injury in relation to voltage, "no-let-go" phenomenon, symptoms and perceived safety culture: a survey of Swedish male electricians.

Authors:  Lisa Rådman; Ylva Nilsagård; Kristina Jakobsson; Åsa Ek; Lars-Gunnar Gunnarsson
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 4.  Guidelines for vocational evaluation following burns: integrated review of relevant process and factors.

Authors:  Mary Stergiou-Kita; Alisa Grigorovich
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-12

5.  Electrical burn injury: a five-year survey of 682 patients.

Authors:  Yaser Ghavami; Mohammad Reza Mobayen; Reza Vaghardoost
Journal:  Trauma Mon       Date:  2014-11-25

Review 6.  Post electrical or lightning injury syndrome: a proposal for an American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual formulation with implications for treatment.

Authors:  Christopher J Andrews; Andrew D Reisner; Mary Ann Cooper
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.135

7.  Electrical injury - a dual center analysis of patient characteristics, therapeutic specifics and outcome predictors.

Authors:  Jochen Gille; Thomas Schmidt; Adrian Dragu; Dimitri Emich; Peter Hilbert-Carius; Thomas Kremer; Thomas Raff; Beate Reichelt; Apostolos Siafliakis; Frank Siemers; Michael Steen; Manuel F Struck
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Acute and long-term clinical, neuropsychological and return-to-work sequelae following electrical injury: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Nada Radulovic; Stephanie A Mason; Sarah Rehou; Matthew Godleski; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Prevalence and associated predictors for patients developing chronic neuropathic pain following burns.

Authors:  Kevin M Klifto; A Lee Dellon; C Scott Hultman
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2020-05-01

10.  Mental disorders following electrical injuries-A register-based, matched cohort study.

Authors:  Karin Biering; Jesper Medom Vestergaard; Anette Kærgaard; Ole Carstensen; Kent J Nielsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.