Literature DB >> 20395408

Trends in US movie tobacco portrayal since 1950: a historical analysis.

Patrick E Jamieson1, Dan Romer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Portrayal of tobacco use in films has been causally linked to youth smoking initiation. However, findings regarding trends in portrayal in US films since 1950 are inconsistent, potentially due to differences in sampling densities, intercoder reliabilities and time periods covered. The present study was designed to overcome these inconsistencies with a common sampling frame and methodology.
METHODS: A half sample of the 30 top-grossing US films per year from 1950 to 2006 (N=855) was coded in 5-min segments for total tobacco-related content and main character tobacco use. Film tobacco trends were identified using linear regression and compared to national per capita cigarette consumption and historically significant tobacco control events.
RESULTS: Tobacco content declined considerably since 1950. Total tobacco-related content peaked around 1961, while the decline in portrayal of main character use was already underway in 1950. Cigarette consumption peaked around 1966 with a trend that closely paralleled total tobacco content and that coincided with major tobacco control events.
CONCLUSIONS: This study, which had high reliability, dense sampling and covered a long time period, indicates that tobacco content has declined in top-ranked US movies since 1950 with a trend in total tobacco content that closely paralleled the drop in per capita cigarette consumption and the increase in significant tobacco control efforts. Despite the inability to draw causal conclusions, tobacco portrayal in films may serve as barometer of societal support for the habit and thus efforts should continue to limit exposure to such content.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20395408     DOI: 10.1136/tc.2009.034736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  9 in total

1.  Prevalence of smoking in movies as perceived by teenagers longitudinal trends and predictors.

Authors:  Kelvin Choi; Jean L Forster; Darin J Erickson; Deann Lazovich; Brian G Southwell
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Counteracting the Influence of Peer Smoking on YouTube.

Authors:  Daniel Romer; Patrick E Jamieson; Kathleen Hall Jamieson; Christopher Jones; Susan Sherr
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2017-03-17

3.  Trends in tobacco and alcohol brand placements in popular US movies, 1996 through 2009.

Authors:  Elaina Bergamini; Eugene Demidenko; James D Sargent
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 16.193

4.  Four arguments against the adult-rating of movies with smoking scenes.

Authors:  Simon Chapman; Matthew C Farrelly
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  Misleading Claims About Tobacco Products in YouTube Videos: Experimental Effects of Misinformation on Unhealthy Attitudes.

Authors:  Dolores Albarracin; Daniel Romer; Christopher Jones; Kathleen Hall Jamieson; Patrick Jamieson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Adolescents have unfavorable opinions of adolescents who use e-cigarettes.

Authors:  Karma McKelvey; Lucy Popova; Jessica K Pepper; Noel T Brewer; Bonnie Halpern-Felsher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Changes in prevalence, and factors associated with tobacco use among Bangladeshi school students: evidence from two nationally representative surveys.

Authors:  Tanvir Ahammed; Nasar U Ahmed; Md Jamal Uddin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Did limits on payments for tobacco placements in US movies affect how movies are made?

Authors:  Matthis Morgenstern; Mike Stoolmiller; Elaina Bergamini; James D Sargent
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Puff or pass: do social media and social interactions influence smoking behaviour of university students? A cross-sectional mixed methods study from Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Naym Uddin Roby; M Tasdik Hasan; Sahadat Hossain; Enryka Christopher; Md Kapil Ahmed; Ariful Bari Chowdhury; Shahriar Hasan; Fatema Ashraf
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.