Literature DB >> 20394966

A randomized trial of transvesical prostatectomy versus transurethral resection of the prostate for prostate greater than 80 mL.

Rubiao Ou1, Meng You, Ping Tang, Hui Chen, Xiangrong Deng, Keji Xie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We compared the safety and efficacy of transvesical prostatectomy (TVP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for prostate greater than 80 mL in a prospective randomized trial.
METHODS: Eighty patients with urodynamic obstruction and prostate volume >80 mL were prospectively randomized and assigned to TVP or TURP. Patients were assessed preoperatively and followed up at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. International prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life score (QoLS), maximum flow rate (Q(max)(.)), and postvoid residual volume (PVR) were obtained at each follow-up. Perioperative data and postoperative outcomes were compared. All complications were recorded.
RESULTS: Of 80 patients eligible to participate, 69 patients completed 12 months of follow-up. TURP procedure was not faster than TVP procedure (P = .41); 53.2% and 84.4% of prostatic tissue were resected after TURP and TVP, respectively (P < .001). In the TVP group, IPSS, Q(max)(.), QoLS, and PVR volume were significantly better than those in TURP group at 3 and 12 months of follow-up. At 12 months postoperatively, IPSS improved 87.6% and 62.3%, mean Q(max)(.) increased by 11.49 mL/s (230.2%) and 6.33 mL/s (102%), and mean PVR volume decreased by 71.2 mL (88.6%) and 65.4 mL (70.5%) in TVP and TURP group, respectively. Two TURP patients developed urethral stricture requiring reoperation.
CONCLUSIONS: TVP may be more effective and safer than TURP for the benign prostatic hyperplasia patient whose prostate volume is >80 mL.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20394966     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.01.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  13 in total

1.  Surgical treatment of large volume prostates: a matched pair analysis comparing the open, endoscopic (ThuVEP) and robotic approach.

Authors:  Sebastian Nestler; T Bach; T Herrmann; S Jutzi; F C Roos; C Hampel; J W Thüroff; C Thomas; A Neisius
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  [S2e guideline of the German urologists: Instrumental treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia].

Authors:  T Bschleipfer; T Bach; R Berges; K Dreikorn; C Gratzke; S Madersbacher; M-S Michel; R Muschter; M Oelke; O Reich; C Tschuschke; K Höfner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to uncomplicated benign prostatic hyperplasia in Italy: updated summary from AURO.it.

Authors:  Sebastiano Spatafora; Antonio Casarico; Andrea Fandella; Caterina Galetti; Rodolfo Hurle; Elisa Mazzini; Ciro Niro; Massimo Perachino; Roberto Sanseverino; Giovanni Luigi Pappagallo
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2012-12

Review 4.  Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: is there evidence to go beyond the experimental stage?

Authors:  Nishant D Patel; J Kellogg Parsons
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Comparison of Robot-Assisted Versus Open Simple Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Ankur A Shah; Jeffrey C Gahan; Igor Sorokin
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  'Minimum-incision' endoscopically assisted transvesical prostatectomy: Surgical technique and early outcomes.

Authors:  Tarek M El-Karamany; Ahmed M Al-Adl; Shabieb A Abdel-Baky; Abdallah F Abdel-Azeem; Mohamed A Zaazaa
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2014-04-28

7.  Transvesical open prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in the era of minimally invasive surgery: Perioperative outcomes of a contemporary series.

Authors:  Ahmed M Elshal; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Tamer S Barakat; Mohamed M Elsaadany; Ahmed S El-Hefnawy
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2013-07-31

8.  Conventional monopolar transurethral resection of prostate in patients with large prostate (≥80 grams).

Authors:  Mehmet Yucel; Bekir Aras; Soner Yalcinkaya; Namik Kemal Hatipoglu; Erol Aras
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2013-11-18

9.  Open suprapubic versus retropubic prostatectomy in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia during resident's learning curve: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Arie Carneiro; Paulo Sakuramoto; Marcelo Langer Wroclawski; Pedro Herminio Forseto; Alexandre Den Julio; Carlos Ricardo Doi Bautzer; Leonardo Monte Marques Lins; Andre Kataguiri; Fernanda Batistini Yamada; Gabriel Kushiyama Teixeira; Marcos Tobias-Machado; Antonio Carlos Lima Pompeo
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

10.  Comparative Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Transurethral Bipolar Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate and Transurethral Bipolar Plasmakinetic Resection of the Prostate for Massive Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (>80 ml).

Authors:  Yumei Jiang; Xiaojing Bai; Xinwei Zhang; Meiyu Wang; Juanhua Tian; Lijun Mu; Na Zhang; Man Li; Yuefeng Du
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-04-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.