OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of contemporary automatic external defibrillator (AED) use. BACKGROUND: In the PAD (Public Access Defibrillation) trial, survival was doubled by focused training of lay volunteers to use an AED in high-risk public settings. METHODS: We performed a population-based cohort study of persons with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest before emergency medical system (EMS) arrival at Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) sites between December 2005 and May 2007. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the independent association between AED application and survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: Of 13,769 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 4,403 (32.0%) received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation but had no AED applied before EMS arrival, and 289 (2.1%) had an AED applied before EMS arrival. The AED was applied by health care workers (32%), lay volunteers (35%), police (26%), or unknown (7%). Overall survival to hospital discharge was 7%. Survival was 9% (382 of 4,403) with bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation but no AED, 24% (69 of 289) with AED application, and 38% (64 of 170) with AED shock delivered. In multivariable analyses adjusting for: 1) age and sex; 2) bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed; 3) location of arrest (public or private); 4) EMS response interval; 5) arrest witnessed; 6) initial shockable or not shockable rhythm; and 7) study site, AED application was associated with greater likelihood of survival (odds ratio: 1.75; 95% confidence interval: 1.23 to 2.50; p < 0.002). Extrapolating this greater survival from the ROC EMS population base (21 million) to the population of the U.S. and Canada (330 million), AED application by bystanders seems to save 474 lives/year. CONCLUSIONS: Application of an AED in communities is associated with nearly a doubling of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. These results reinforce the importance of strategically expanding community-based AED programs. Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of contemporary automatic external defibrillator (AED) use. BACKGROUND: In the PAD (Public Access Defibrillation) trial, survival was doubled by focused training of lay volunteers to use an AED in high-risk public settings. METHODS: We performed a population-based cohort study of persons with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest before emergency medical system (EMS) arrival at Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) sites between December 2005 and May 2007. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the independent association between AED application and survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: Of 13,769 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 4,403 (32.0%) received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation but had no AED applied before EMS arrival, and 289 (2.1%) had an AED applied before EMS arrival. The AED was applied by health care workers (32%), lay volunteers (35%), police (26%), or unknown (7%). Overall survival to hospital discharge was 7%. Survival was 9% (382 of 4,403) with bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation but no AED, 24% (69 of 289) with AED application, and 38% (64 of 170) with AED shock delivered. In multivariable analyses adjusting for: 1) age and sex; 2) bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed; 3) location of arrest (public or private); 4) EMS response interval; 5) arrest witnessed; 6) initial shockable or not shockable rhythm; and 7) study site, AED application was associated with greater likelihood of survival (odds ratio: 1.75; 95% confidence interval: 1.23 to 2.50; p < 0.002). Extrapolating this greater survival from the ROC EMS population base (21 million) to the population of the U.S. and Canada (330 million), AED application by bystanders seems to save 474 lives/year. CONCLUSIONS: Application of an AED in communities is associated with nearly a doubling of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. These results reinforce the importance of strategically expanding community-based AED programs. Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: R L Page; J A Joglar; R C Kowal; J D Zagrodzky; L L Nelson; K Ramaswamy; S J Barbera; M H Hamdan; D K McKenas Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-10-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ian G Stiell; Clif Callaway; Dan Davis; Tom Terndrup; Judy Powell; Andrea Cook; Peter J Kudenchuk; Mohamud Daya; Richard Kerber; Ahamed Idris; Laurie J Morrison; Tom Aufderheide Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2008-05-19 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Ian G Stiell; Lisa P Nesbitt; Graham Nichol; Justin Maloney; Jonathan Dreyer; Tammy Beaudoin; Josée Blackburn; George A Wells Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: M C Colquhoun; D A Chamberlain; R G Newcombe; R Harris; S Harris; K Peel; C S Davies; R Boyle Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2008-06-17 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Tom P Aufderheide; Peter J Kudenchuk; Jerris R Hedges; Graham Nichol; Richard E Kerber; Paul Dorian; Daniel P Davis; Ahamed H Idris; Clifton W Callaway; Scott Emerson; Ian G Stiell; Thomas E Terndrup Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2008-05-19 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Kurt J Greenlund; Nora L Keenan; Paula F Clayton; Dilip K Pandey; Yuling Hong Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-06-14 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Véronique L Roger; Alan S Go; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Robert J Adams; Jarett D Berry; Todd M Brown; Mercedes R Carnethon; Shifan Dai; Giovanni de Simone; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Kurt J Greenlund; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; P Michael Ho; Virginia J Howard; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Diane M Makuc; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Mary M McDermott; James B Meigs; Claudia S Moy; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Nina P Paynter; Wayne D Rosamond; Paul D Sorlie; Randall S Stafford; Tanya N Turan; Melanie B Turner; Nathan D Wong; Judith Wylie-Rosett Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-12-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M Austin Johnson; Brian J H Grahan; Jason S Haukoos; Bryan McNally; Robert Campbell; Comilla Sasson; David E Slattery Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Baltasar Sánchez; Ramón Algarte; Ivana Valdelvira; Francisco Fernandez-Dorado; Salvador Quintana; Thomas Geeraerts; Jean-Christophe Richard; Laurent Papazian; Jean-Daniel Chiche Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-05-08 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Chun Yue Francis Lee; Venkataraman Anantharaman; Swee Han Lim; Yih Yng Ng; Tek Siong Chee; Chong Meng Seet; Marcus Eng Hock Ong Journal: Singapore Med J Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 1.858