Literature DB >> 20394868

Proximal endovascular occlusion for carotid artery stenting: results from a prospective registry of 1,300 patients.

Eugenio Stabile1, Luigi Salemme, Giovanni Sorropago, Tullio Tesorio, Wail Nammas, Marianna Miranda, Grigore Popusoi, Angelo Cioppa, Vittorio Ambrosini, Linda Cota, Giampaolo Petroni, Giovanni Della Pietra, Angelo Ausania, Arturo Fontanelli, Giancarlo Biamino, Paolo Rubino.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This single-center registry presents the results of proximal endovascular occlusion (PEO) use in an unselected patient population.
BACKGROUND: In published multicenter registries, the use of PEO for carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been demonstrated to be safe and efficient in patient populations selected for anatomical and/or clinical conditions.
METHODS: From July 2004 to May 2009, 1,300 patients underwent CAS using PEO. Patients received an independent neurological assessment before the procedure and 1 h, 24 h, and 30 days after the procedure.
RESULTS: Procedural success was achieved in 99.7% of patients. In hospital, major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events included 5 deaths (0.38%), 6 major strokes (0.46%), 5 minor strokes (0.38%), and no acute myocardial infarction. At 30 days of follow-up, 2 additional patients died (0.15%), and 1 patient had a minor stroke (0.07%). The 30-day stroke and death incidence was 1.38% (n = 19). Symptomatic patients presented a higher 30-day stroke and death incidence when compared with asymptomatic patients (3.04% vs. 0.82%; p < 0.05). No significant difference in 30-day stroke and death rate was observed between patients at high (1.88%; n = 12) and average surgical risk (1.07; n = 7) (p = NS). Operator experience, symptomatic status, and hypertension were found to be independent predictors of adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of PEO for CAS is safe and effective in an unselected patient population. Anatomical and/or clinical conditions of high surgical risk were not associated with an increased rate of adverse events. Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20394868     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  18 in total

Review 1.  Predicting Hemodynamic Changes of Cerebral Blood Flow during Temporal Carotid Occlusion: A Review of Current Knowledge with Implication for Carotid Artery Stenting.

Authors:  Miloslav Spacek; Cyril Stechovsky; Martin Horvath; Petr Hajek; Josef Veselka
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2015-06-26

Review 2.  Management of symptomatic carotid disease in 2014.

Authors:  Jason Litsky; Erik Stilp; Roland Njoh; Carlos Mena-Hurtado
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  State of the art in carotid artery stenting: trial data, technical aspects, and limitations.

Authors:  Rajan A G Patel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Carotid artery disease and stenting: insights from recent clinical trials.

Authors:  Ronan Margey; Douglas E Drachman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2011-04

5.  Stroke prevention: carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Christopher J White
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2010-03-25

6.  [Carotid artery stenting technique].

Authors:  J Schofer; K Bijuklic
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 7.  Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amir Gahremanpour; Emerson C Perin; Guilherme Silva
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2012

8.  Comparison of dual protection and distal filter protection as a distal embolic protection method during carotid artery stenting: a single-center carotid artery stenting experience.

Authors:  Yosuke Kajihara; Shigeyuki Sakamoto; Yoshihiro Kiura; Kazutoshi Mukada; Takahiro Chaki; Shiro Kajihara; Kaoru Kurisu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Safety and Efficacy of Flow Reversal in Acute and Elective Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting Using the Mo.Ma Device with Short-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Ambooj Tiwari; Ryan Bo; Keithan Sivakumar; Karthikeyan M Arcot; Philip Ye; David T Parrella; Jeffrey Farkas
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2019-08-05

Review 10.  Selective-versus-Standard Poststent Dilation for Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  O Petr; W Brinjikji; M H Murad; B Glodny; G Lanzino
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.